Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/10.1063/1.3676065
1.
1. A. Giusti-Suzor, F. H. Mies, L. F. DiMauro, E. Charron, and B. Yang, J. Phys. B 28, 309 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/28/3/006
2.
2. J. H. Posthumus, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 623 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/5/R01
3.
3. G. Jolicard and O. Atabek, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5845 (1992).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.5845
4.
4. D. Pavičić, A. Kiess, T. W. Hänsch, and H. Figger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 163002 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.163002
5.
5. K. Sändig, H. Figger, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4876 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4876
6.
6. I. Ben-Itzhak, P. Q. Wang, J. F. Xia, A. M. Sayler, M. A. Smith, K. D. Carnes, and B. D. Esry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 073002 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.073002
7.
7. B. Feuerstein and U. Thumm, Phys. Rev. A 67, 043405 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.043405
8.
8. V. N. Serov, A. Keller, O. Atabek, and N. Billy, Phys. Rev. A 68, 053401 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.053401
9.
9. R. F. Lu, P. Y. Zhang, and K. L. Han, Phys. Rev. E 77, 066701 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.066701
10.
10. J. Hu, K. L. Han, and G. Z. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 123001 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.123001
11.
11. H. Niikura, F. Légaré, R. Hasbani, M. Y. Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Nature (London) 421, 826 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01430
12.
12. S. E. Koonin, K. T. R. Davies, V. Maruhn-Rezwani, H. Feldmeier, and S. J. Krieger, Phys. Rev. C 15, 1359 (1977).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.15.1359
13.
13. S. Chelkowski, T. Zuo, O. Atabek, and A. D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2977 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.2977
14.
14. Y. Zhang, T. X. Xie, K. L. Han, and J. Z. H. Zhang, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12921 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1626537
15.
15. R. F. Lu, T. S. Chu, and K. L. Han, J. Phys. Chem. A. 109, 6683 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0520401
16.
16. R. F. Lu, T. S. Chu, Y. Zhang, K. L. Han, and A. J. C. Varandas, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 133108 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2202826
17.
17. T. S. Chu, Y. Zhang, and K. L. Han, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25, 201 (2006), and references therein.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01442350600677929
18.
18. P. Y. Zhang, R. F. Lu, A. J. Zhang, T. S. Chu, and K. L. Han, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 091103 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2884352
19.
19. H. X. He, R. F. Lu, P. Y. Zhang, Y. H. Guo, K. L. Han, and G. Z. He, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033418 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.033418
20.
20. A. Staudte, S. Patchkovskii, D. Pavičić, H. Akagi, O. Smirnova, D. Zeidler, M. Meckel, D. M. Villeneuve, R. Dörner, M. Yu. Ivanov, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033004 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.033004
21.
21. M. Uhlmann, T. Kunert, and R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. A 72, 045402 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.045402
22.
22. J. H. Posthumus, J. Plumridge, L. J. Frasinski, K. Codling, A. J. Langley, and P. F. Taday, J. Phys. B 31, L985 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/31/24/003
23.
23. J. H. Posthumus, J. Plumridge, K. Codling, L. J. Frasinski, A. J. Langley, and P. F. Taday, Laser Physics 9, 163 (1999).
24.
24. L. J. Frasinski, J. Plumridge, J. H. Posthumus, K. Codling, P. F. Taday, E. J. Divall, and A. J. Langley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2541 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2541
25.
25. B. Feuerstein and U. Thumm, J. Phys. B 36, 707 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/36/4/305
26.
26. R. F. Lu, C. Y. Xiao, K. M. Deng, and H. P. Wu, Chem. Phys. 382, 88 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.03.003
27.
27. M. Lein, T. Kreibich, E. K. U. Gross, and V. Engel, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033403 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033403
28.
28. V. Roudnev, B. D. Esry, and I. Ben-Itzhak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 163601 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.163601
29.
29. T. Zuo and A. D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2511 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2511
30.
30. G. Jolicard and O. Atabek, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5845 (1992).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.5845
31.
31. S. Chelkowski, C. Foisy, and A. D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1176 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1176
32.
32. P. H. Bucksbaum, A. Zavriyev, H. G. Muller, and D. W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1883 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1883
33.
33. L. J. Fransinski, J. H. Posthumus, J. Plumridge, K. Codling, P. F. Taday, and A. J. Langley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3625 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3625
34.
34. A. Kästner, F. Grossmann, S. Krause, R. Schmidt, A. Kenfack, and J. Rost, New J. Phys. 11, 083014 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/8/083014
35.
35. A. Kästner, F. Grossmann, R. Schmidt, and J. Rost, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023414 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.023414
36.
36. Th. Ergler, A. Rudenko, B. Feuerstein, K. Zrost, C. D. Schröter, R. Moshammer, and J. Ullrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 093001 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.093001
37.
37. H. A. Leth, L. B. Madsen, and J. F. McCann, Phys. Rev. A 76, 033414 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.033414
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/10.1063/1.3676065
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/10.1063/1.3676065
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/10.1063/1.3676065
2012-01-10
2016-02-13

Abstract

Competition between dissociation and ionization of H2 + in intense laser field has been investigated by using an accurate three-dimensional time-dependent wavepacket approach. The disagreement between the experiment and the former one-dimensional theory has been resolved. In a comparison of the calculated results with the available experimental data, a good agreement is reached, not only for the relative probabilities between dissociation and ionization but also for the two-peak structures and the peak energy locations for these two processes.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/1.3676065.html;jsessionid=5o5hqlsqn4fw.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/2/10.1063/1.3676065&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jcp
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd