1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Optimizing hierarchical equations of motion for quantum dissipation and quantifying quantum bath effects on quantum transfer mechanisms
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4724193
/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/22/10.1063/1.4724193
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/22/10.1063/1.4724193

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Friction spectrum J(ω)/ω, via Eq. (3) by a common reorganization energy λ, as function of ω (in unit of ωBO), for the critically damped (r BO = 1, black), critically weakly underdamped (r BO = 0.5, red), and strongly underdamped (r BO < 0.5, blue) BO cases, respectively. The inset plots the corresponding J(ω) curves.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The parameters and in the [N + 1/N] Bose function approximant [Eq. (12)] as functions of N. Note that is negative and scales approximately as , for large N, while behaves similarly as the [N/N] counterpart, R N = 1/[4(N + 1)(2N + 3)] (black dash curve).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The residue function δC N (ω)/λ vs. βω using the [N + 1/N] X (black), [N + 1/N] (red), (blue dash), and MSD (black dot) schemes, with N = 1 in all. The BO parameters are r BO = 0.04 and βωBO = 10. The scaled accuracy control parameters are {16.9,22}, {16.3,21.1}, and {15.5,19.9}, for [2/1] X , , and MSD N = 1, respectively.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The residue spectrum function δC N (ω), for the [N/N] (solid black), [N/N] X (red dash), and MSD (blue dot) schemes, with N = 1 and the four specified values of βγD. See Table I for the scaled accuracy control parameters .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The scaled residue function δC N (ω)/Δ N vs. ω/Γ N using the [N + 1/N] scheme, for the BO parameters r BO = 0.5, 1, 2 and βωBO = 1 or 10, at some selected values of N.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The scaled accuracy control parameters using the [N + 1/N] scheme, as functions of βωBO for r BO = 0.5 (black), 1 (red), and 2 (blue).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Dynamic results of ET systems at T = 298 K, subject to the strongly underdamped BO bath with r BO = 0.25 (black), the critically damped case with r BO = 1 (red), and overdamped case with r BO = 3 (blue), respectively. Panel (a) shows the relative entropy related quantity φ(t) [Eq. (26)]. Panels (b) and (c) illustrate the population evolution P α(t) = ραα(t), and the state resolved measure of interference ϕα(t) [Eq. (27)], respectively, for the acceptor (thick curves) and bridge (thin curves) sites.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Same as in Fig. 7, but with the temperature T = 77 K.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

The delocalized populations (left panels) and the delocalized state-resolved interference measures (right panels), recasting Figs. 8(b) and 8(c) in the eigenstate representation of the reduced system.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

The scaled accuracy control parameters , corresponding to each residue function in Fig. 4.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/22/10.1063/1.4724193
2012-06-11
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Optimizing hierarchical equations of motion for quantum dissipation and quantifying quantum bath effects on quantum transfer mechanisms
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/136/22/10.1063/1.4724193
10.1063/1.4724193
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM