banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
X-ray diffraction assisted spectroscopy of Rydberg states
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the proposed experiment. The sample atoms are excited by a laser with planar polarization along the -axis. The direction of the incoming x-ray beam is k 0, which defines the -axis, and the diffracted x-rays are measured along k. The direction of k is expressed in spherical angles θ, ϕ relative the incoming x-ray beam k 0.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Radial Rydberg electron wave functions R j (r) for H and Xe atoms. The classical turning point, r tp , for the wave functions scales as r tp = 2n 2. The wave functions are bound-state normalized. (a) (H atom) Radial wave functions for L = 0 (M = 0) and principal quantum numbers n = 1 (top), n = 10 (middle), and n = 20 (bottom). (b) (Xe atom) Radial electronic Rydberg wave functions for states E 1 and E 2 in channels j = 1–5 (see Table I). The core is contained inside the volume r c < 5 a.u. The principal quantum numbers in the channels j = 1–3 are n ≈ 20, and n ≈ 5 in j = 4–5.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The Rydberg electron density in the yz-plane for state E 1 in Xe (see Table I). (a)–(c) show channels j = 1, 3, and 5, respectively. The density is isotropic in channels j = 1, 4, and anisotropic in the other channels. The electron density has been multiplied by the radius r, and re-normalized so that the maximum value is 1 in each channel in order to aid visualization. (a) Channel j = 1. (b) Channel j = 3 (and channel j = 2 by a 90° rotation around the perpendicular -axis). (c) Channel j = 5 (note that j = 4 is similar in size and nodal pattern, but is isotropic like j = 1).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Diffraction patterns from states in H atoms with different angular momentum L, but otherwise identical quantum numbers n = 10 and M = 0. The angular momenta L = 0 (top), L = 1 (middle), and L = 2 (bottom) correspond to s, p, and d orbitals. The righthand column shows the electron density for each state in the yz-plane (see Figure 3 for technical details) and the lefthand column shows contour plots of the diffraction, | f(θ, ϕ)|2, along the radial θ and angular ϕ coordinates (see Figure 1). The x-ray wavelength is λ = 150 a.u. (156 eV) and the incoming x-ray is aligned with the -axis. Note that background diffraction from, e.g., ground state atoms is not included.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Diffraction signal as function of the radial angle θ for different x-ray probe wavelengths λ from H atoms with angular momentum L = M = 0 and principal quantum number n = 10 (classical turning point at 200 a.u.). The probe wavelength λ needs to be matched to the spatial dimensions of the radial wave function to avoid loss of information. The range λ = 5–600 a.u. corresponds to photon energies 4.7 keV–39 eV. Details of the diffraction pattern are shown in the insert.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The radial diffraction signal as a function of principal quantum number n. The greatest difference is between n = 1 and n = 2 (top), but it remains significant for n = 10 and n = 11 (middle) and even for n = 20 and n = 21 (bottom). In each case, the x-ray wavelength λ is chosen to match the size of the electronic state (λ = 6 a.u. at the top, λ = 150 a.u. in the middle and λ = 250 a.u. at the bottom, corresponding to photon energies 3.9 keV, 156 eV, and 94 eV, respectively). Angular quantum numbers are L = M = 0, and the difference signal △ n,n+1 is included as a dotted line in each plot.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Contour plots of the diffraction, | f(θ, ϕ)|2, from the Rydberg and the core electrons in Xe atom states E 1 and E 2 (see Table I and Figure 2(b)) for x-ray probe wavelength λ = 5 a.u. (4.7 keV) and λ = 300 a.u. (78 eV). The diffraction angles θ, ϕ are defined in Figure 1. The short wavelength λ = 5 a.u. (bottom row) predominantly probes the core, while λ = 300 a.u. (top row) is more sensitive to the Rydberg electron. The diffraction pattern for state E 1 (left column) is quite different from the pattern for state E 2 (right column), due to the large change in channel populations between the two states, and associated change in spatial angular distribution. (a) State E 1, λ = 300 a.u. (b) State E 2, λ = 300 a.u. (c) State E 1, λ = 5 a.u. (d) State E 2, λ = 5 a.u.


Generic image for table
Table I.

The calculated character of the two bound Xe states E 1 and E 2 given as the % population in each channel. The three channels j = 1–3 correspond to the ground electronic state of the core and j = 4–5 to the first excited state. Core states are given as , where J c is the total, L is the orbital and S is the spin angular momentum of the core. The Rydberg electron is given as , where l is the electron orbital and j e is the total electron angular momentum, including the electron spin.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: X-ray diffraction assisted spectroscopy of Rydberg states