1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A combined spectroscopic and theoretical study of propofol·(H2O)3
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4743960
/content/aip/journal/jcp/137/7/10.1063/1.4743960
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/137/7/10.1063/1.4743960

Figures

Image of Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.

Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol).

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Eight most stable structures of propofol·(H2O)3 as calculated at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level. Relative energies in kJ/mol.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Two-color REMPI spectra of propofol·(H2O)n, n = 0–3 obtained in a supersonic expansion of propofol/water in 2 bars of He and with the probe laser tuned at 27 972 cm−1. The zoom also offers a comparison between the spectra of propofol·(H2O)3 obtained using He and Ne. Disappearance of some features is observed, probably due to population transfer between isomers.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Comparison between propofol·(H2O)3 2-color REMPI spectrum and the hole-burning traces obtained tuning the probe laser at 36 195 (*) and 36 255 cm−1 (**), respectively. Two isomers are detected in the expansion.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Comparison between the experimental IR/UV traces obtained for the two detected propofol·(H2O)3 conformers and the predicted spectra for some representative structures. Comparison with the complete set of calculated structures can be found in Fig. S3 of the supplementary material.10 A correction factor of 0.938 was employed to account for the anharmonicity.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Comparison between the experimental IR/UV traces obtained for the two detected propofol·(H2O)3 in ground and excited electronic states. The calculated spectra for the structures s1, s2, and s3 in their first excited electronic state are also included. CIS/6-31G(d,p) calculation level was employed in the excited state calculation. Also, a correction factor of 0.88 was used to account for the anharmonicity.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(Lower panel) Electronic ground state potential energy curve obtained using the calculated structure s2 as starting point and rotating the isopropyl group on the right in 30º steps, while the rest of the coordinates are relaxed. (Upper panel) A more detailed scan around the global minimum was performed, rotating the same isopropyl group in 10° steps. Two shallow minima separated by a very small barrier are found. Calculations performed at B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. The blue lines represent a spline fit, added as an eye guide.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(Lower panel) Reaction coordinate scan from structure s2 to s1 in the electronic ground state, calculated at M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level. A true transition state was located. (Upper panel) Estimation of the same reaction path in the first excited electronic state, built running a single point TD-DFT calculation on each structure of the S0 path. The blue lines represent a spline fit, added as an eye guide.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Comparison between the calculated structures of propofol·(H2O)3 s2 and phenol·(H2O)3 at M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p). The atoms of phenol·(H2O)3 are shown as white spheres.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Band origins and frequencies (cm−1) of the observed OH stretching vibrations of propofol·(H2O)3 and phenol·(H2O)3.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/137/7/10.1063/1.4743960
2012-08-15
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A combined spectroscopic and theoretical study of propofol·(H2O)3
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/137/7/10.1063/1.4743960
10.1063/1.4743960
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM