1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Interfacial growth as a model of tube-width heterogeneities in concentrated solutions of stiff polymers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4811661
/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/24/10.1063/1.4811661
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/24/10.1063/1.4811661
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

The dimensionless tube-width distribution, (), as calculated from Eq. (9) , versus the dimensionless tube width, , where, and , for the following values of the dimensionless deflection length, = /: 0.07, 0.09, 0.12, and 0.15. Inset: () versus at = 0.3, highlighting the asymmetry of the distribution.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The scaled tube-width distribution ⟨ (), as calculated from Eq. (9) , versus the scaled tube width /⟨⟩ (solid black line) at a value of (0.09) that has been adjusted for best fit to experimental data points (open symbols) obtained from the inset to Fig. 3 of Ref. using the program in Ref. to reconstruct the data. The different symbols correspond to different chain concentrations, these being (in mg/ml): 0.2 (circles), 0.4 (squares), 0.6 (diamonds), 0.8 (triangles), and 1.0 mg/ml (inverted triangles). The dashed blue curve is the fit obtained by Glaser from a self-consistent pair collision theory. The dashed red curve is a fit obtained in Ref. from an analytical approximation to that theory.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The coefficient of variation versus chain concentration (in mg/ml) for experiment (open symbols) and theory (horizontal lines). The open symbols correspond to the data on F-actin shown in Fig. 5 of Ref. , as reconstructed using the program in Ref. . The solid line is the curve = 0.218 obtained by evaluating (using Eq. (9) ) at that value of (0.09) at which ⟨ () best fits the experimental data (see Fig. 2 ). The dashed line is the theoretical curve = 0.155 as calculated by Glaser and Kroy. Inset: versus 1/ , as calculated from Eq. (9) , showing the location of the point = 0.218 at = 0.09.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/24/10.1063/1.4811661
2013-06-28
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Interfacial growth as a model of tube-width heterogeneities in concentrated solutions of stiff polymers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/24/10.1063/1.4811661
10.1063/1.4811661
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM