1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
f
Comment on “On the theoretical determination of the Prigogine-Defay ratio in glass transition” [J. Chem. Phys.136, 124502 (2012)]
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648
1.
1. T. V. Tropin, J. W. P. Schmelzer, I. Gutzow, and C. Schick, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 124502112450214 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3694531
2.
2. J. W. P. Schmelzer and I. Gutzow, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 184511118451111 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2374894
3.
3. J. W. P. Schmelzer and I. Gutzow, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 355, 653662 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.014
4.
4. T. V. Tropin, J. W. P. Schmelzer, and C. Schick, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357, 13031309 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.005
5.
5. R. O. Davies and G. O. Jones, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 217, 2642 (1953).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0044
6.
6. R. O. Davies and G. O. Jones, Adv. Phys. (Philos. Mag., Suppl.) 2, 370410 (1953).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00018735300101252
7.
7. J.-L. Garden, H. Guillou, J. Richard, and L. Wondraczek, e-print arXiv:1004.1272v1 [physics.chem-ph].
8.
8. J.-L. Garden, H. Guillou, J. Richard, and L. Wondraczek, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 37, 143177 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jnetdy-2011-0036
9.
9. I. Gutzow and J. Schmelzer, The Vitreous State (Springer, 1995).
10.
10. J.-L. Garden, H. Guillou, J. Richard, and L. Wondraczek, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 024505 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4733333
11.
11. I. Prigogine and R. Defay, Chemical Thermodynamics (Longmans, 1954).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648
2013-02-11
2014-10-31

Abstract

Generally, experimentally determined values of the Prigogine-Defay (PD) ratio are different from unity. This can be explained if one considers that more than one single order parameter are involved in the thermodynamics of the glass transition process. Against the consensual view, Tropin et al. demonstrated that PD ratios can be different from unity even if one single order parameter is involved. This “Comment” aims to discuss fundamental mistakes leading to this conclusion in the recent article “On the theoretical determination of the Prigogine-Defay ratio in glass transition” [J. Chem. Phys.136, 124502 (Year: 2012)] by Tropin et al. 10.1063/1.3694531

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/1.4790648.html;jsessionid=w38mw1faf96k.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jcp
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Comment on “On the theoretical determination of the Prigogine-Defay ratio in glass transition” [J. Chem. Phys.136, 124502 (2012)]
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/138/6/10.1063/1.4790648
10.1063/1.4790648
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM