1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Electromagnetically induced transparency and fluorescence in blockaded Rydberg atomic system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4826637
/content/aip/journal/jcp/139/16/10.1063/1.4826637
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/139/16/10.1063/1.4826637
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Spatial beam geometry used in the experiment. (b) The diagram of the X-type five-level system.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) From top to bottom in each column, there are measured signals of probe, FWM , FWM , and fluorescence versus Δ, respectively, in which the differences among (a1)–(a5) are that the variable of (a1)–(a3) is the detuning Δ with level |2⟩ being 37D, and (a4)–(a5) is the principal quantum number (45D and 54D, respectively) corresponding to (a1). (b11)–(b41) Fluorescence signal R1 modulated by versus Δ and (b12)–(b42) pure Rydberg EIT versus Δ at four discrete principal quantum numbers . (c) Dependences of (b11)–(b41) fluorescence and (b12)–(b42) EIT on the principal quantum number .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) K2 EIT signals versus Δ are obtained at different values of the detuning Δ in each panel. (a1)–(a4) correspond to = 37D, 45D, 54D, and 63D, respectively. (b) Theoretical calculations corresponding to the experimental data shown in (a). (c) Principal quantum number dependences of k2 EIT signals obtained at seven discrete detuning values of Δ, in which the upper curves are the orignal data and the lower ones are the values scaled with the dipole transition probability. (d) Theoretical calculations corresponding to the results shown in (c). (e)–(h) The fluorescence signals R1 obtained with the same method as k2 EIT.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The experimentally measured probe transmission (a) and fluorescence signals (e) by scanning Δ under different discrete points Δ in Y-type four energy level system. (b) and (f) are the theoretically calculated results of (a) and (e). From ((a1), (b1), (e1), (f1)) to ((a4), (b4), (e4), (f4)), the principal quantum numbers are = 37, 45, 54, and 63, respectively. The dependence curves of the EIT peak height (c) and (d) and fluorescence strength (g) and (h) on principal quantum number corresponding to (a) and (b) and (e) and (f), respectively, in which the seven panels are corresponding to the signals at the left, right sides of large detuning, or the left, left-top, right, right-top, and top of the EIT signals.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The measured probe transmission (a), fluorescence (b), and FWM (c) signals with Δ scanned at different Δ. (d), (e), and (f) are the theoretically calculated results corresponding to (a), (b), and (c). From ((a1), (b1), (c1), (d1), (e1), and (f1)) to ((a4), (b4), (c4), (d4), (e4), and (f4)), the principal quantum numbers are = 37, 45, 54, and 63, respectively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/139/16/10.1063/1.4826637
2013-10-30
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Electromagnetically induced transparency and fluorescence in blockaded Rydberg atomic system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/139/16/10.1063/1.4826637
10.1063/1.4826637
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM