No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
multiple cloning algorithm for quantum nonadiabatic molecular dynamics
2. V. Blanchet, M. Z. Zgierski, T. Seideman, and A. Stolow, “Discerning vibronic molecular dynamics using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy,” Nature (London) 401, 52 (1999).
3. E. Collini, C. Y. Wong, K. E. Wilk, P. M. G. Curmi, P. Brumer, and G. D. Scholes, “Coherently wired light-harvesting in photosynthetic marine algae at ambient temperature,” Nature (London) 463, 644 (2010).
4. J. L. Herek, W. Wohlleben, R. J. Cogdell, D. Zeidler, and M. Motzkus, “Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting,” Nature (London) 417, 533 (2002).
5. D. G. Kuroda, C. P. Singh, Z. Peng, and V. D. Kleiman, “Mapping excited-state dynamics by coherent control of a dendrimers photoemission efficiency,” Science 326, 263 (2009).
9. M. E. Tuckerman, P. J. Ungar, T. von Rosenvinge, and M. L. Klein, “Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations,” J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12878 (1996).
11. H.-D. Meyer and W. H. Miller, “A classical analog for electronic degrees of freedom in nonadiabatic collision processes,” J. Chem. Phys. 70, 3214 (1979).
14. J. C. Tully and R. K. Preston, “Trajectory surface hopping approach to nonadiabatic molecular collisions: The reaction of H+ with D2,” J. Chem. Phys. 55, 562 (1971).
17. P. V. Parandekar and J. C. Tully, “Detailed balance in Ehrenfest mixed quantum-classical dynamics,” J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2, 229 (2006).
18. J. R. Schmidt, P. V. Parandekar, and J. C. Tully, “Mixed quantum-classical equilibrium: Surface-hopping,” J. Chem. Phys. 129, 044104 (2008).
19. T. J. Martinez and R. D. Levine, “First-principles molecular dynamics on multiple electronic states: A case study of NaI,” J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6334 (1996).
20. T. J. Martinez and R. D. Levine, “Dynamics of the collisional electron transfer and femtosecond photodissociation of NaI on ab initio electronic energy curves,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 259, 252 (1996).
23. T. J. Martinez, M. Ben-Nun, and G. Ashkenazi, “Classical/quantal method for multistate dynamics: A computational study,” J. Chem. Phys. 104, 2847 (1996).
24. T. J. Martinez, M. Ben-Nun, and R. D. Levine, “Multi-electronic-state molecular dynamics: A wave function approach with applications,” J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7884 (1996).
27. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martinez, “Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics: Validation of the multiple spawning method for a multidimensional problem,” J. Chem. Phys. 108, 7244 (1998).
28. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martinez, “A continuous spawning method for nonadiabatic dynamics and validation for the zero-temperature spin-boson problem,” Isr. J. Chem. 47, 75 (2007).
31. I. Burghardt, H. D. Meyer, and L. S. Cederbaum, “Approaches to the approximate treatment of complex molecular systems by the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree method,” J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2927 (1999).
33. G. A. Worth, M. A. Robb, and B. Lasorne, “Solving the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for nuclear motion in one step: Direct dynamics of non-adiabatic systems,” Mol. Phys. 106, 2077 (2008).
35. S. Yang, J. D. Coe, B. Kaduk, and T. J. Martinez, “An ‘optimal’ spawning algorithm for adaptive basis set expansion in nonadiabatic dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 130, 134113 (2009).
37. K. Saita and D. V. Shalashilin, “On-the-fly ab initio molecular dynamics with multiconfigurational Ehrenfest method,” J. Chem. Phys. 137, 22A506 (2012).
38. D. V. Shalashilin, “Multiconfigurational Ehrenfest approach to quantum coherent dynamics in large molecular systems,” Faraday Discuss. 153, 105 (2011).
39. D. V. Shalashilin, “Nonadiabatic dynamics with the help of multiconfigurational Ehrenfest method: Improved theory and fully quantum 24D simulation of pyrazine,” J. Chem. Phys. 132, 244111 (2010).
40. D. V. Shalashilin, “Quantum mechanics with the basis set guided by Ehrenfest trajectories: Theory and application to spin-boson model,” J. Chem. Phys. 130, 244101 (2009).
41. E. R. Bittner and P. J. Rossky, “Quantum decoherence in mixed quantum-classical systems: Nonadiabatic processes,” J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8130 (1995).
43. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martinez, “Exploiting temporal nonlocality to remove scaling bottlenecks in nonadiabatic quantum dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4134 (1999).
44. D. V. Shalashilin and M. S. Child, “Basis set sampling in the method of coupled coherent states: Coherent state swarms, trains and pancakes,” J. Chem. Phys. 128, 054102 (2008).
45. M. Ronto and D. V. Shalashilin, “Numerical implementation and test of the modified variational multiconfigurational Gaussian method for high-dimensional quantum dynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. A 117(32), 6948 (2013).
49. B. O. Roos, “Theoretical studies of electronically excited states using multiconfigurational perturbation theory,” Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 137 (1999).
50. T. Mori, W. J. Glover, M. S. Schuurman, and T. J. Martinez, “Role of Rydberg states in the photochemical dynamics of ethylene,” J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 2808 (2012).
51. H. Tao, B. G. Levine, and T. J. Martinez, “Ab initio multiple spawning dynamics using multi-state second-order perturbation theory,” J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 13656 (2009).
52. H. Tao, T. K. Allison, T. W. Wright, A. M. Stooke, C. Khurmi, J. van Tilborg, Y. Liu, R. W. Falcone, A. Belkacem, and T. J. Martinez, “Ultrafast internal conversion in ethylene. I. The excited state lifetime,” J. Chem. Phys. 134, 244306 (2011).
53. R. J. Sension and B. S. Hudson, “Vacuum ultraviolet resonance Raman studies of the excited electronic states of ethylene,” J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1377 (1989).
54. E. F. Cromwell, A. Stolow, M. J. J. Vrakking, and Y. T. Lee, “Dynamics of ethylene photodissociation from rovibrational and translational energy distributions of H2 products,” J. Chem. Phys. 97, 4029 (1992).
56. A. Viel, R. P. Krawczyk, U. Manthe, and W. Domcke, “Photoinduced dynamics of ethene in the N, V, and Z valence states: A six-dimensional nonadiabatic quantum dynamics investigation,” J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11000 (2004).
57. A. Viel, R. P. Krawczyk, U. Manthe, and W. Domcke, “The sudden-polarization effect and its role in the ultrafast photochemistry of ethene,” Ang. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3434 (2003).
58. K. Kosma, S. A. Trushin, W. Fuss, and W. E. Schmid, “Ultrafast dynamics and coherent oscillations in ethylene and ethylene-d(4) excited at 162nm,” J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 7514 (2008).
60. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martinez, “Electronic absorption and resonance Raman spectroscopy from ab initio quantum molecular dynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10517 (1999).
61. M. Sulc, H. Hernandez, T. J. Martinez, and J. Vanicek, “Relation of exact Gaussian basis methods to the dephasing representation: Theory and application to time-resolved electronic spectra,” J. Chem. Phys. 139, 034112 (2013).
Article metrics loading...
We present a new algorithm for ab initio quantum nonadiabatic molecular dynamics that combines the best features of ab initio Multiple Spawning (AIMS) and Multiconfigurational Ehrenfest (MCE) methods. In this new method, ab initio multiple cloning (AIMC), the individual trajectory basis functions (TBFs) follow Ehrenfest equations of motion (as in MCE). However, the basis set is expanded (as in AIMS) when these TBFs become sufficiently mixed, preventing prolonged evolution on an averaged potential energy surface. We refer to the expansion of the basis set as “cloning,” in analogy to the “spawning” procedure in AIMS. This synthesis of AIMS and MCE allows us to leverage the benefits of mean-field evolution during periods of strong nonadiabatic coupling while simultaneously avoiding mean-field artifacts in Ehrenfest dynamics. We explore the use of time-displaced basis sets, “trains,” as a means of expanding the basis set for little cost. We also introduce a new bra-ket averaged Taylor expansion (BAT) to approximate the necessary potential energy and nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements. The BAT approximation avoids the necessity of computing electronic structure information at intermediate points between TBFs, as is usually done in saddle-point approximations used in AIMS. The efficiency of AIMC is demonstrated on the nonradiative decay of the first excited state of ethylene. The AIMC method has been implemented within the AIMS-MOLPRO package, which was extended to include Ehrenfest basis functions.
Full text loading...
Most read this month