Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366
1.
1.A. F. Chrimes, K. Khoshmanesh, P. R. Stoddart, A. Mitchell, and K. Kalantar-zadeh, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5880 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cs35515b
2.
2.A. F. Palonpon, M. Sodeoka, and K. Fujita, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 708 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.05.021
3.
3.K. A. Antonio and Z. D. Schultz, Anal. Chem. 86, 30 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac403640f
4.
4.R. S. Das and Y. K. Agrawal, Vib. Spectrosc. 57, 163 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2011.08.003
5.
5.C. Krafft and J. Popp, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407, 699 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8311-9
6.
6.D. Cialla, A. März, R. Böhme, F. Theil, K. Weber, M. Schmitt, and J. Popp, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 403, 27 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5631-x
7.
7.E. C. L. Ru and P. G. Etchegoin, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 63, 65 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143757
8.
8.Z. H. Kim, Front. Phys. 9, 25 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0338-4
9.
9.S. Schlücker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 4756 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205748
10.
10.Y. S. Yamamoto, Y. Ozaki, and T. Itoh, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 21, 81 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.10.001
11.
11.E. L. Keller, N. C. Brandt, A. A. Cassabaum, and R. R. Frontiera, Analyst 140, 4922 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5AN00869G
12.
12.L. Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L. Fabris, and R. A. Alvarez-Puebla, Anal. Chim. Acta 745, 10 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.08.003
13.
13.H. Wang, X. Jiang, S.-T. Lee, and Y. He, Small 10, 4455 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201401563
14.
14.L. Yang, P. Li, and J. Liu, RSC Adv. 4, 49635 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4RA09231G
15.
15.D.-W. Li, W.-L. Zhai, Y.-T. Li, and Y.-T. Long, Microchim. Acta 181, 23 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00604-013-1115-3
16.
16.Z. Li, M. J. Deen, S. Kumar, and P. R. Selvaganapathy, Sensors 14, 17275 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140917275
17.
17.S. McAughtrie, K. Faulds, and D. Graham, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 21, 40 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.09.002
18.
18.D. P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: An Introduction to Radiation-Molecule Interactions (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1998).
19.
19.G. Juzeliūnas, Phys. Rev. A 53, 3543 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.53.3543
20.
20.D. L. Andrews and D. S. Bradshaw, Eur. J. Phys. 25, 845 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/25/6/017
21.
21.A. Salam, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: Long-Range Intermolecular Interactions (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010).
22.
22.D. L. Andrews and D. S. Bradshaw, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 526, 173 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.201300219
23.
23.D. L. Andrews and N. P. Blake, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2547 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.2547
24.
24.D. L. Andrews, D. S. Bradshaw, J. M. Leeder, and J. Rodríguez, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 5250 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b803546f
25.
25.L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY, 1995).
26.
26.J. A. Salthouse and M. J. Ware, Point Group Character Tables and Related Data (Cambridge University Press, London, 1972).
27.
27.M. P. E. Lock, D. L. Andrews, and G. A. Jones, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 044103 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4861695
28.
28.See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948366 for the complete molecular tensor expressions.[Supplementary Material]
29.
29.L. C. Dávila Romero, S. Naguleswaran, G. E. Stedman, and D. L. Andrews, Nonlinear Opt. 23, 191 (2000).
30.
30.D. L. Andrews and T. Thirunamachandran, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5026 (1977).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.434725
31.
31.D. H. Friese, M. T. P. Beerepoot, and K. Ruud, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 204103 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4901563
32.
32.C. D. Allemand, Appl. Spectrosc. 24, 348 (1970).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/000370270774371552
33.
33.D. A. Long, The Raman Effect: A Unified Treatment of the Theory of Raman Scattering by Molecules (Wiley, Chichester, New York, 2002).
34.
34.D. L. Andrews and T. Thirunamachandran, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2941 (1978).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.436047
35.
35.D. L. Andrews and P. Allcock, Optical Harmonics in Molecular Systems (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366
2016-05-05
2016-12-05

Abstract

Raman scattering is most commonly associated with a change in vibrational state within individual molecules, the corresponding frequency shift in the scattered light affording a key way of identifying material structures. In theories where both matter and light are treated quantum mechanically, the fundamental scattering process is represented as the concurrent annihilation of a photon from one radiation mode and creation of another in a different mode. Developing this quantum electrodynamical formulation, the focus of the present work is on the spectroscopic consequences of electrodynamic coupling between neighboring molecules or other kinds of optical center. To encompass these nanoscale interactions, through which the molecular states evolve under the dual influence of the input light and local fields, this work identifies and determines two major mechanisms for each of which different selection rules apply. The constituent optical centers are considered to be chemically different and held in a fixed orientation with respect to each other, either as two components of a larger molecule or a molecular assembly that can undergo free rotation in a fluid medium or as parts of a larger, solid material. The two centers are considered to be separated beyond wavefunction overlap but close enough together to fall within an optical near-field limit, which leads to high inverse power dependences on their local separation. In this investigation, individual centers undergo a Stokes transition, whilst each neighbor of a different species remains in its original electronic and vibrational state. Analogous principles are applicable for the anti-Stokes case. The analysis concludes by considering the experimental consequences of applying this spectroscopic interpretation to fluid media; explicitly, the selection rules and the impact of pressure on the radiant intensity of this process.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/1.4948366.html;jsessionid=_ud_IEb1j4iOPwJ-MJmKFl5A.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jcp
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=jcp.aip.org/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jcp/144/17/10.1063/1.4948366'
Right1,Right2,Right3,