Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Theory of the Diffuse Double Layer
1.D. C. Grahame, Chem. Rev. 41, 441 (1947).
2.B. Breyer and F. Gutmann, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1323 (1953).
3.J. R. Macdonald and M. K. Brachman, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1314 (1954).
4.Freise, Z. Elektrochem. 56, 822 (1952).
5.R. Schlögl, Z. Physik 202, 379 (1954).
6.J. J. Bikerman, Phil. Mag. 33, 384 (1942).
7.R. H. Fowler and E. A. Guggenheim, Statistical Thermodynamics (The MacMillan Company, New York, 1956), p. 387.
8.J. G. Kirkwood and J. C. Poirier, J. Phys. Chem. 58, 591 (1954).
9.In this connection, see F. P. Buff and F. H. Stillinger, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 25, 312 (1956).
10.H. Cramér, Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1946), p. 185.
11.Reference to Eqs. (13) shows immediately that this approximation is equivalent to replacing the moments and by and
12.The exact position of the electrode is not critical; we wish only to imply here that for x decreasing through zero, the short‐range electrode potential becomes rapidly very large (strong repulsion).
13.The use of these integral equations actually corresponds to allowing m to increase to infinity.
14.Such simplification was inherent in the rigid‐sphere model by using step‐function pair correlations.
15.In water, at room temperature, this corresponds to about 0.8 moles/liter for a uniunivalent electrolyte with a equal to
Article metrics loading...