No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Electron Spin Resonance Studies of γ‐ and X‐Ray‐Irradiated Zeolites
1.P. E. Pickert, J. A. Rabo, E. Dempsey, and V. Schomaker, Proc. Intern. Congr. Catalysis, 3rd Amsterdam 1, 714 (1964).
2.D. N. Stamires and J. Turkevich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 757 (1964).
3.J. Turkevich, F. Nozaki, and D. M. Stamires, Proc. Intern. Congr. Catalysis, 3rd Amsterdam 1, 586 (1964).
4.L. Broussard and D. P. Shoemaker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 1091 (1960).
5.W. H. Baur, Am. Mineralogist 49, 697 (1964).
6.R. P. Dodge and V. Schomaker (unpublished work).
7.The signal reported by Stamires and Turkevich2 for irradiated Na‐Y is probably of this type.
8.The ESR signal of an ion has been extensively studied in alkali superoxides by J. E. Bennett, D. J. E. Ingram, M. C. R. Symons, P. George, and J. S. Griffith, Phil. Mag. 46, 443 (1955),
8.and J. E. Bennett, D. J. E. Ingram, and D. Schonland, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 69A, 556 (1956). The signals in these materials, however, are interpreted in terms of an axially symmetric g tensor with and
9.C. E. Moore, Natl. Bur. Std. (U.S.) Circ. No. 467 (1949).
10.A. H. Kahn and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 89, 315 (1953).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month