No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Polarizabilities and Hyperpolarizabilities of Small Polyatomic Molecules in the Uncoupled Hartree–Fock Approximation
1.A. D. Buckingham, Quart. Rev. (London) 13, 183 (1959).
2.See, for example, E. B. Wilson, J. C. Decius, and P. C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1955).
3.R. W. Terhune, P. D. Maker, and C. M. Savage, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 681 (1965).
4.R. Bersohn, Y.‐H. Pao, and H. L. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 3184 (1966).
5.S. J. Cyvin, J. E. Rauch, and J. C. Decius, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 4083 (1965).
6.An example for the case of polarizabilities is given in the Ref. 2, pp. 40 and 286.
7.J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Bucuing, and P. S. Pershan, Phys. Rev. 127, 1918 (1962).
8.See, for example, A. Dalgarno, Advan. Phys. 11, 281 (1962).
9.J. O. Hirschfelder, W. B. Brown, and S. T. Epstein, Advan. Quantum Chem. 1, 298 (1964).
10.P. W. Langhoff, M. Karplus, and R. P. Hurst, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 505 (1966).
11.An example of this type of technique for two perturbations is given in Ref. 9.
12.See, for example, H. J. Kolker and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 2011 (1963).
13.See, for example, H. M. Foley, R. M. Sternheimer, and D. Tycko, Phys. Rev. 93, 734 (1954).
14.J. M. O’Hare and R. P. Hurst, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 2356 (1967).
15.D. Neumann and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2056 (1968).
16.D. Neumann and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 2216 (1969).
17.J. A. Pople, J. W. McIver, Jr., and N. S. Oslund, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2960 (1968).
18.J. A. Pople, J. W. McIver, Jr., and N. S. Oslund, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2965 (1968).
19.G. P. Arrighini, M. Maestro, and R. Moccia, Chem. Phys. Letters 1, 242 (1967).
20.G. P. Arrighini, C. Guidotti, M. Maestro, R. Moccia, and O. Salvetti, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2224 (1968).
21.See, for example, W. N. Lipscom, Advan. Magnetic Resonance 2, 138 (1966).
22.J. F. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 3321 (1968).
23.This seems reasonable since the first order function used to calculate the hyperpolarizability was optimized with respect to the polarizability.
24.The depolarization ratio is unfortunately quite insensitive to the hyperpolarizability and is therefore not a very good test of the reliability of the various components.
25.P. D. Maker (unpublished).
26.P. D. Maker, Physical and Quantum Electronics, edited by P. L. Kelly, B. Lax, and P. E. Tannenwald (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1966), p. 60.
27.A. D. Buckingham and B. J. Orr, Quart. Rev. 21, No. 2, 195 (1967).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month