No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Comment on ’’Mechanism of NO2 fluorescence queching’’
1.S. Butler, C. Kahler, and D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 815 (1975), hereinafter referred to as Paper I.
2.V. M. Donnelly and F. Kaufman, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 4768 (1977).
3.G. H. Myers, D. M. Silver, and F. Kaufman, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 718 (1966);
3.L. F. Keyser, F. Kaufman, and E. C. Zipf, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2, 523 (1968);
3.L. F. Keyser, S. Z. Levine, and F. Kaufman, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 355 (1971);
3.V. M. Donnelly and F. Kaufman, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 4100 (1977);
3.and S. E. Schwartz and H. S. Johnston, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 1286 (1969).
4.K. Sakurai and H. P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 2404 (1969).
5.A striking visual demonstration of this may be seen by comparing the top trace of Fig. 3, Ref. 4 (taken at 100 μ pressure and 5208 Å excitation wavelength) with Fig. 1c, Ref. 2 (taken at 10 μ pressure and 5230 Å excitation wavelength). It should be noted that part of the difference in these two figures is due to the higher spectral resolution used in Ref. 4.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month