No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effective core potentials for the cadmium and mercury atoms
1.L. R. Kahn and W. A. Goddard III, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2, 667 (1968).
2.C. F. Melius, W. A. Goddard III, and L. R. Kahn, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3342 (1972).
3.C. F. Melius and W. A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. A 10, 1528 (1974).
4.L. R. Kahn, P. Baybutt, and D. G. Truhlar, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 3826 (1976).
5.S. Topiol, J. W. Moskowitz, C. F. Melius, M. D. Newton, and J. Jafri, ERDA Research and Development Report COO‐3077–105. The basis functions for first‐row valence s‐orbitals reported in the first version of this Report have subsequently been revised. For the carbon atom, the new exponents, which were used in the present study, are: 17.81368, 4.51197, 0.49301, and 0.15080 a.u.
6.G. M. Bancroft, D. K. Creber, and H. Basch, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 4891 (1977).
7.(a) H. Basch, J. Jafri, M. D. Newton, and S. Topiol (unpublished).
7.(b) It should be noted that for any basis set short of the Hartree‐Fock limit, it is difficult to define basis sets of comparable quality for comparisons between all‐electron and ECP calculations.
7.(c) Appreciable differences between the all‐electron and ECP results for were first noted by Hay and Wadt, and studies on the problem analogous to those reported here have been carried out by P. J. Hay, W. R. Wadt, and L. R. Kahn, J. Chem. Phys. (in press).
7.(d) The occurrence of excessively attractive long‐range tails appears to be limited to the last columns of the periodic table and is not, for example, observed for the carbon atom ECP5 employed here.
8.T. H. Dunning, Chem. Phys. Lett. 7, 432 (1970).
9.C. Fischer‐Froese, Comp. Phys. Commun. 4, 107 (1972).
10.H. Basch, M. D. Newton, and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. (in press).
11.S. Topiol, C. F. Melius, and J. W. Moskowitz (unpublished).
12.A. Buchler, W. Klemperer, and A. G. Emslie, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 2499 (1962).
13.A. M. W. Bakke, J. Mol. Spectr. 41, 1 (1972).
14.(a) V. I. Vedeneyev, L. V. Gurvick, V. N. Koudrat’yev, V. A. Medvedev, and Ye. L. Frankevich, Bond Energies, Ionization Energies and Electron Affinities (Edward Arnold, London, 1968);
14.Selected Values of Chemical Thermodynamical Properties, N.B.S. Technical Note 270–3 (1966).
14.(b) D. D. Wagman, W. H. Evans, V. B. Parker, I. Halow, S. M. Bailey, and R. H. Schumm, NBS Technical Note 270–3 (1968).
14.(c) D. D. Wagman, W. H. Evans, V. B. Parker, I. Halow, S. M. Bailey, and R. H. Schumm, NBS Technical Note 270–4 (1969).
15.J. P. Desclaux and Y. K. Kim, J. Phys. B 8, 1177 (1975).
16.J. P. Desclaux, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 12, 311 (1973).
17.W. J. Hehre, Acc. Chem. Res. 9, 399 (1976).
18.J. B. Collins, P. von R. Schleyer, S. J. Binkley, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 5142 (1976).
19.L. C. Snyder and H. Basch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 2189 (1969).
20.M. A. Ratner, J. W. Moskowitz, and S. Topiol, Chem. Phys. Lett. 46, 495 (1977).
21.G. M. Bancroft, D. K. Creber, M. A. Ratner, J. W. Moskowitz, and S. Topiol (preprint).
22.J. H. D. Eland, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 4, 37 (1970).
23.P. Burroughs, S. Evans, A. Hamnett, A. F. Orchard, and N. V. Richardson, J. Chem. Soc. 1974, 921.
24.N. C. Handy, M. T. Marron, and H. J. Silverstone, Phys. Rev. 180, 45 (1969).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month