No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Classical models for electronic degrees of freedom: Derivation via spin analogy and application to F*+H2→F+H2
1.W. H. Miller and C. W. McCurdy, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 5163 (1978).
2.C. W. McCurdy, H. D. Meyer, and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 3177 (1979).
3.H. D. Meyer and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 3214 (1979).
4.W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 4431 (1978).
5.F. Rebentrost and W. A. Lester, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 67, 3367 (1977).
6.H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA, 1950), p. 288.
7.W. H. Miller, Adv. Chem. Phys. 25, 69 (1974).
8.D. Secrest and B. R. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 4556 (1966).
9.F. Rebentrost and W. A. Lester, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 3879 (1976).
10.This is the correct relation between the Cartesian and angular momentum basis sets, as used in Ref. 9. Different (and inconsistent) phase factors were used in Ref. 1.
11.D. G. Truhlar and J. W. Duff, Chem. Phys. Lett. 36, 551 (1975).
12.J. C. Tully and R. K. Preston, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 562 (1971);
12.see also, J. C. Tully, in “State‐to‐State Chemistry,” Am. Chem. Soc. 56, 206 (1977).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month