No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Hole burning, softon–phonon scattering, and ultrafast dephasing of impurity electronic transitions in glasses
1.J. M. Hayes, R. P. Stout, and G. J. Small, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 4129 (1980).
2.T. J. Aartmsa and D. A. Wiersma, Chem. Phys. Lett. 42, 520 (1976).
3.D. A. Wiersma (to be published).
4.K. E. Jones and A. H. Zewail, In. Advances in Chemical Physics, edited by A. H. Zewail, Springer Series in Chemical Physics (Springer, New York, 1978).
5.C. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5607 (1977).
6.G. J. Small, Chem. Phys. Lett. 57, 501 (1978).
7.P. de Bree and D. A. Wiersma, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 790 (1979).
8.F. P. Burke and G. J. Small, Chem. Phys. 5, 198 (1974);
8.F. P. Burke and G. J. Small, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 4588 (1974).
9.S. Hunklinger and W. Arnold, in Physical Acoustics, edited by R. N. Thurston and W. P. Mason (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. 12, p. 155.
10.J. M. Hayes and G. J. Small, Chem. Phys. 27, 151 (1978).
11.J. M. Hayes and G. J. Small, Chem. Phys. Lett. 54, 435 (1978).
12.J. M. Hayes and G. J. Small, J. Lumin. 18/19, 219 (1979).
13.F. Drissler, F. Graf, and D. Haarer, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4996 (1980).
14.No detectable changes in the integrated hole intensity were observed in samples kept at or below the burn temperature for up to 6 h, the typical length of an experiment.
15.A TLS with a sufficiently small barrier to allow ultrafast relaxation with the impurity in the excited state would be expected to have too small a barrier to prevent relaxation with the impurity in the ground state. While this is not necessarily true, our data indicate that it is true for the glasses we have studied.
16.J. Jäckie, Z. Phys. 257, 212 (1972).
17.R. H. Silsbee, in Optical Properties of Solids, edited by Sol Nudelman and S. S. Mitra (Plenum, New York, 1969), p. 607.
18.A. S. Dayydov, Quantum Mechanics (NEO, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1966), p. 332.
19.The quadratic term [cf. Eq. (1)] is not taken into account.
20.J. Friedrich, D. D. Swalen, and D. Haarer, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 705 (1980).
21.E. Cuellar and G. Castro, Chem. Phys. 54, 217 (1981).
22.J. Friedrich and D. Haarer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 503 (1980).
23.P. M. Selzer, D. L. Huber, D. S. Hamilton, W. M. Yen, and M. J. Weber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 813 (1976).
24.P. Avouris, A. Campion, and M. A. El‐Sayed, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 3397 (1977).
25.J. Hegarty and W. M. Yen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1126 (1979).
26.T. L. Reinecke, Solid State Commun. 32, 1103 (1979).
27.S. K. Lyo and R. Orbach, Phys. Rev. B 22, 4223 (1980).
28.M. A. Krivoglaz, Sov. Phys. Solid State 6, 1340 (1964).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month