No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Reply to the ‘‘Comment on ‘The relationship between shape resonances and bond lengths’ ’’
1.A. P. Hitchcock and J. Stöhr, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3253 (1987).
2.M. N. Piancastelli, D. W. Lindle, T. A. Ferrett, and D. A. Shirley, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2765 (1987).
3.J. L. Dehmer, D. Dill, and S. Wallace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1005 (1979).
4.J. R. Swanson, D. Dill, and J. L. Dehmer, Phys. Rev. B 14, L207 (1981).
5.M. N. Piancastelli, P. R. Keller, J. W. Taylor, F. A. Grimm, T. A. Carlson, M. O. Krause, and D. Lichtenberger, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 34, 205 (1984).
6.F. Sette, J. Stöhr, and A. P. Hitchcock, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 4906 (1984).
7.One other possible “process” omitted from the discussion in Ref. 2 is that maxima in absorption may be due to the accidental sum of several different and distinct continuum eigenchannels, and thus not resonances at all.
8.H. P. Hitchcock, S. Beaulieu, T. Steel, J. Stöhr, and F. Sette, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3927 (1984).
9.By proof, it does not suffice to symmetry label an absorption feature as σ or π by virtue of polarization‐dependent studies, because other processes, such as double excitation, may show the same symmetry as a supposed shape resonance.
10.C. M. Truesdale, D. W. Lindle, P. H. Kobrin, U. E. Becker, H. G. Kerkhoff, P. A. Heimann, T. A. Ferrett, and D. A. Shirley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2319 (1984).
Data & Media loading...
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...