No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Rotational dynamics in simple dense liquids
1.G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5035 (1988).
2.(a) G. T. Evans, R. G. Cole, and D. K. Hoffman, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 3209 (1982);
2.(b) D. R. Evans and G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6039 (1984); , J. Chem. Phys.
2.(c) R. G. Cole, D. K. Hoffman, and G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5365, 5375 (1985); , J. Chem. Phys.
2.(d) M. P. Allen, G. T. Evans, and D. Frenkel (unpublished). Preliminary analysis of the MD derived values (from Ref. 3) indicate that EKT predicts the observed to within a few percent.
3.M. P. Allen and D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1748 (1987).
4.D. Kivelson and T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 4599 (1972).
5.(a) J. R. Mehaffey, R. C. Desai, and R. Kapral, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 1665 (1977);
5.(b) J. O’Dell and B. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2376 (1975)., J. Chem. Phys.
6.B. J. Alder, D. M. Gass, and T. E. Wainwright, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 3813 (1970).
7.G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 3860 (1987).
8.D. R. Evans, D. K. Hoffman, and G. T. Evans, unpublished results on chattering. The importance of chattering has been found to depend on the reduced mass of the collision pair and the moment of inertia of the rotating molecule. For systems favoring chattering (a large and sluggish atom which departs slowly from a rapidly rotating light diatom, (e.g., is decreased by 5.7% from the EKT prediction. Rotational energy cross sections which are particularly chattering sensitive, are decreased by 30% from its Enskog value in this same system, whereas the linear momentum cross sections are increased by 8%. See also, R. G. Cole, D. R. Evans, and D. K. Hoffman, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2061 (1985).
9.(a) R. S. C. She and G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1514 (1986);
9.(b) R. S. C. She, C. James, and G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1525 (1986)., J. Chem. Phys.
10.R. G. Cole and G. T. Evans, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 37, 105 (1986).
11.H. Mori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 33, 423 (1965).
12.(a) T. Keyes and A. J. Masters, Adv. Chem. Phys. 58, 1 (1985);
12.(b) A. J. Masters and T. Keyes, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2603 (1983).
13.R. G. Cole and T. Keyes, J. Stat. Phys. 51, 249 (1988).
14.J. R. Dorfman, in Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechanics, edited by E. D. G. Cohen (North‐Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
15.(a) H. van Beijeren and J. R. Dorfman, J. Stat. Phys. 23, 335 (1980);
15.(b) R. I. Cukier, R. Kapral, J. R. Lebenhaft, and J. R. Mehaffey, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5244 (1980);
15.(c) T. Keyes and J. Mercer, Physica A 95, 473 (1979).
16.B. Kumar and G. T. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1812 (1989).
17.Other related kinetic theories of the self‐diffusion coefficient include (a) P. Resibois, J. Stat. Phys. 13, 393 (1975);
17.(b) P. M. Furtado, G. F. Mazenko, and S. Yip, Phys. Rev. A 14, 869 (1976);
17.(c) R. I. Cukier and J. R. Mehaffey, Phys. Rev. A A 18, 1202 (1978)., Phys. Rev. A
18.J. Talbot, M. P. Allen, G. T. Evans, D. Frenkel, and D. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4330 (1989).
19.For a general reference on Smoluchowski equations see H. L. Friedman, A Course in Statistical Mechanics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985).
20.(a) R. I. Cukier, R. Kapral, and J. R. Mehaffey, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5254 (1980);
20.(b) G. T. Evans and B. Kumar, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1804 (1989).
21.D. W. Rebertus and K. M. Sando, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 2585 (1977).
22.P. S. Hubbard, Phys. Rev. 131, 1155 (1963).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month