No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Reactive islands as essential mediators of unimolecular conformational isomerization: A dynamical study of 3‐phospholene
1.E. N. Lorenz, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963).
2.J. Gleick, CHAOS: Making a New Science (Viking Penguin, New York, 1987).
3.A. Libchaber, Nonlinear Phenomena at Phase Transitions and Instabilities, edited by T. Riste (Plenum, New York, 1982).
4.Nonlinear Phenomena in Chemical Dynamics, edited by C. Vidal and A. Pacault (Springer, New York, 1981).
5.R. May and G. F. Oster, Am. Nat. 110, 573, 1976.
6.M. Feigenbaum, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 25, 1978.
7.F. Ruelle and F. Takens, Comm. Math. Phys. 20, 167 (1971).
8.H. L. Swinney and R. C. Roux, Nonequilibrium Chemical Reaction Dynamics, edited by C. Vidal and A. Pacault (Springer, New York, 1984).
9.J. D. Farmer, E. Ott, and J. A. York, Physica 7 D, 153, 1983.
10.M. Henon and C. Heiles, Astron. J. 69, 73 (1964).
11.S. R. Channon and J. L. Lebowitz, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 357, 108 (1980).
12.J. H. Bartlett, Cel. Mech. 28, 295 (1982).
13.R. S. Mackay, J. D. Meiss, and I. C. Percival, Physica D 13, 55 (1984).
14.R. S. Mackay, J. D. Meiss and I. C. Percival, Physica D 27, 1 (1987).
15.D. Bensimon and L. P. Kadanoff, Physica D 13, 82 (1984).
16.M. J. Davis, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1016 (1985).
17.R. Craig Brown and R. E. Wyatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1 (1986).
18.R. Craig Brown and R. E. Wyatt, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 3590 (1986).
19.M. J. Davis, Chemistry Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, 60439 (private communication).
20.S. K. Gray, S. A. Rice, and M. J. Davis, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 3470 (1986).
21.R. T. Skodje and M. J. Davis, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2429 (1988).
22.M. J. Davis, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 3978 (1987).
23.S. K. Gray and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2020 (1987).
24.N. De Leon and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 3495 (1981).
25.When we mention the dynamics of a “system”, we are specifically considering the microcanonical (constant energy) dynamics of a Hamiltonian system. Thus a system is defined by its Hamiltonian and total energy.
26.M. A. Harthcock and J. Laane, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2103 (1983).
27.M. A. Harthcock and J. Laane, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 91, 300 (1982).
28.A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Stochastic Motion (Springer, New York, 1983).
29.M. J. Davis (private communication).
30.N. De Leon and C. C. Marston, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 3405 (1989).
31.Clearly, the proximity of a trajectory within to will dictate the extent to which it will mimic the dynamics on Trajectories on will approach the period 1 fixed point but never react, even after an infinite number of iterations on the map. An extremely small fraction of trajectories take more than two iterations within to react. This means that a trajectory must lie exceedingly close to before it will take three or more iterations within prior to reacting.
32.As a consequence the overlap regions between all RIS have the same area.
33.N. De Leon, A. O. de Almeida, M. Mehta, and C. Clay Marston, Physica D (submitted).
34.N. De Leon, M. Mehta, and R. Topper, (in preparation).
35.M. Mehta and N. De Leon (in preparation).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month