No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Isotropic Raman line widths in binary mixtures of van der Waals liquids: A comparison between isotopically and chemically diluted states of liquid methyl iodide
1.W. G. Rothschild, Dynamics of Molecular Liquids (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984).
2.D. W. Oxtoby, Adv. Chem. Phys. 40, 1 (1979).
3.R.-M. Lynden-Bell, Mol. Phys. 33, 907 (1977).
4.R. K. Wertheimer, Mol. Phys. 36, 1631 (1978).
5.K.-L. Oehme and K. Klostermann, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2124 (1989).
6.S. Bratos and G. Tarjus, Phys. Rev. 24A, 1591 (1981).
7.S. Bratos and G. Tarjus, Phys. Rev. 32A, 2431 (1985).
8.K.-L. Oehme, G. Rudakoff, and K. Klostermann, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1499 (1985).
9.J. Chesnoy and G. M. Gale, Phys. Fr. 9, 893 (1984).
10.F. Seifert, K.-L. Oehme, G. Rudakoff, W. Hölzer, W. Carius, and O. Schröter, Chem. Phys. Lett. 105, 635 (1984).
11.F. Seifert, K.-L. Oehme, and W. Hölzer, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 4778 (1990).
12.C. Kohlmeder, W. Zinth, and W. Kaiser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 91, 323 (1982);
12.A. Fendt, S. F. Fischer, and W. Kaiser, Chem. Phys. 57, 55 (1981).
13.M. W. Evans and J. Yarwood, Adv. Mol. Relaxation Int. Processes 21, 1 (1981).
14.G. Döge, R. Arndt, and A. Khuen, Chem. Phys. 21, 53 (1977).
15.J. H. Campbell, J. F. Fisher, and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 346 (1974).
16.N. Trisdale and M. Schwartz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 68, 461 (1979).
17.See, the discussion in Chaps. 184.108.40.206. and 3.6. of Ref. 1.
18.G. Tarjus and S. Bratos, Phys. Rev. 34A, 4202 (1986);
18.G. Tarjus and S. Bratos, 30A, 1087 (1984)., Chem. Phys. Lett.
19.We use the term (infrared) “chromophore” to denote the vibratory unit, e.g., D. Luckhaus and M. Quack, Chem. Phys. Lett. 190, 581 (1992);
19.M. Quack, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 839 (1990).
20.G. Döge, T. Bien, and M. Possiel, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 85, 1074 (1981).
21.G. Döge, R. Arndt, and J. Yarwood, Mol. Phys. 52, 399 (1984).
22.G. Döge, D. Lindner, W. Richter, and D. Schiel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 172, 453 (1990).
23.F. G. Baglin and H. Versmold, Chem. Phys. Lett. 96, 656 (1983).
24.Y. T. Lee, S. L. Wallen, and J. Jonas, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7161 (1992).
25.D. E. Logan, Mol. Phys. 58, 97 (1986).
26.D. Keutel, F. Seifert, and K.-L. Oehme (unpublished).
27.G. Kabisch and G. Möbius, Spectrochim. Acta, 38, 1189 (1982).
28.W. B. Lacy, K. L. Rowlen, and J. M. Harris, Appl. Spectrosc. 45, 1598 (1991).
29.K. Fujita, T. Fukuda, K. Fukushi, and M. Kimura, J. Raman Spectrosc. 16, 377 (1985).
30.D. Cope, R. Khoury, and R. J. Lovett, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 39, 163 (1988).
31.K. Tanabe and J. Hiraishi, Appl. Spectrosc. 35, 436 (1981).
32.S. P. Wang, W. P. Hu, and M. Schwartz, Mol. Phys. 68, 1125 (1989);
32.note that these authors used a slit opening which corresponds to an instrumental width of up to therefore, the reported isotropic linewidths are highly questionable.
33.R. E. Wilde and T. Zyung, Mol. Phys. 55, 809 (1985);
33.the linewidths reported are approximately 10% larger then ours; this might be caused by instead of used in our study.
34.J. S. Weaving, T. A. Ford, J. Mol. Struct. 161, 245 (1987).
35.J. Santos and J. M. Orza, Mol. Phys. 70, 645 (1990).
36.A. F. Bondaerev and A. I. Mardaeva, Opt. Spectrosc. 35, 167 (1973).
37.G. Döge, R. Arndt, H. Buhl, and G. Bettermann, Z. Naturforsch. 35A, 468 (1980);
37.see also, Chapter 3.5 in Ref. 1.
38.A. Müller, J. Winkelmann, T. Boublik, and J. Fischer, Mol. Phys. 78, 121 (1993).
39.This system was prepared more or less accidentally, i.e., a (less successful) synthesis of results in a mixture of 8% in However, it was this system, where we, for the first time, observed the flattening of upon isotopic dilution.
40.D. Levesque, J.-J. Weis, and D. W. Oxtoby, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 2153 (1982).
41.V. Shelley and J. Yarwood, Mol. Phys. 72, 1407 (1991).
42.A. A. Rodriguez and M. Schwartz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 129, 458 (1986).
43.It would have been a better idea to study the isolated stretching mode in instead of the mode in however, the preparation of the former system would have been much more expensive, also it is easier to study stretching modes then modes because the latter have usual the lower S/N ratio.
44.J.-P. Pinan-Lucarre, Chem. Phys. Lett. 98, 195 (1983).
45.Note that, because of it possible to separate the bands and and
46.F. G. Baglin and L. M. Wilkes, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 3793 (1982);
46.it is not clear whether the half-widths of the overtone near characterize or
46.in the latter case, the results reported would be very dubious because of, as we determined, Even for we obtained a much smaller line width, i.e., instead of for neat near room temperature. Therefore, it seems quite evident that would be obtained. This, however, contradicts all previous experimental observations/theoretical predictions on the relation between the vibrational widths of a fundamental and its corresponding overtones (see Ref. 2). We therefore believe, together with the depolarized -mode and the unusual high intensity of this band (if compared, for example, with ) that the assignment of the intensity is highly questionable, even if it is taken into account that the observed anharmonicity of is quite natural.
47. see J. A. Cowen and J. W. Welch, Can. J. Phys. 59, 1280 (1981); see Ref. 13, note that this value is an extrapolation from using an Arrhenius law.
48.J. A. Barker and D. Henderson, Revs. Mod. Phys. 48, 587 (1976).
49.We estimated the (integrated) infrared intensities in the gaseous state using a BRUKER IFS 66 spectrometer. If the data are scaled on the stretching mode, the following relations were found:
50.P. M. Rentzepis and D. C. Douglass, Nature 293, 165 (1981).
51.G. Davidson and C. L. Davies, Spectrochim. Acta 45A, 371 (1989).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month