No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory
1.Another possible suggestion is to interpret as the desired probability Apart from the fact that there is really no convincing reason for this interpretation this expression is not generally a monotone (decreasing) function of time t, a property which should possess.
2.E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935).
3.D. Williams, Commun. Math. Phys. 21, 314 (1971);
3.L. Horwitz, J. P. Marchand, and J. Lavita, Rocky Mount. J. Math. 1, 225 (1975).
4.G. R. Allcock, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 53, 251–348 (1969).
5.W. Yorgrau in Problems in Philosophy in Science, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (North‐Holland, Amsterdam, 1968), pp. 191–92.
6.H. Ekstein and A. Seigert, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 68, 509 (1971).
7.B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, in preparation.
8.E. P. Wigner, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, edited by B. d’Espgnat (Academic, New York, 1971), especially formulas 14 and 14(a), p. 16.
9.P. R. Chernoff, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 140 (1974).
10.C. N. Friedman, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 21, 1001–11 (1972).
11.E. Hille and R. Phillips, Functional Analysis and Semigroups (Am. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Providence, R.I., 1957).
12.Ref. 11, Sec. 22. 3.
13.C. Chiu, B. Misra, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, in preparation.
14.E. C. G. Sudarshan and B. Misra, in preparation.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...