No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones
1.W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, “A single quantum cannot be cloned” Nature (London) 299, 802–803 (1982).
2.V. Bužek and M. Hillery, “Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844–1852 (1996),
3.M. Hillery and V. Bužek, “Quantum copying: Fundamental inequalities,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 1212–1216 (1997).
4.N. Gisin and S. Massar, “Optimal quantum cloning machines,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2153–2156 (1997),
5.D. Bruß, D. P. DiVincenzo, A. Ekert, C. A. Fuchs, C. Machiavello, and J. A. Smolin, “Optimal universal and state-dependent cloning,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 2368–2378 (1998),
6.D. Bruß, A. Ekert, and C. Machiavello, “Optimal universal cloning and state estimation,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9712019.
7.V. Bužek and M. Hillery, “Universal optimal cloning of qubits and quantum registers,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9801009.
8.P. Zanardi, “A note on quantum cloning in d dimensions,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9804011.
9.N. Gisin and B. Huttner, “Quantum cloning, eavesdropping and Bell’s inequality,” Phys. Lett. A 228, 13–21 (1997).
10.N. Gisin, “Quantum cloning without signaling,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9801005.
11.T. Mor, “No-cloning of orthogonal states in composite systems,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9802036.
12.N. J. Cerf, “Quantum cloning and the capacity of the Pauli channel,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9803058.
13.N. J. Cerf, “Asymmetric quantum cloning machines,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9805024.
14.C. S. Niu and R. B. Griffiths, “Optimal copying of one quantum bit,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9805073.
15.M. Murao, D. Jonathan, M. B. Plenio, and V. Vedral, “Quantum telecloning and multiparticle entanglement,” Los Alamos Report, quant-ph/9806082.
16.R. F. Werner, “Optimal cloning of pure states,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 1827–1832 (1998);
17.In Ref. 16 the symbol T was used for In contrast to Ref. 16 the key arguments in the present paper are phrased more readily in terms of the map on observables than in terms of the map on states. Therefore, we decided to change this notation, which then also agrees better with the usage for completely positive maps on operator algebras.
18.B. Simon, “Representations of finite and compact groups,” Am. Math. Soc. (1996).
19.W. F. Stinespring, “Positive functions on -algebras,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 6, 211–216 (1955).
20.H. Scutaru, “Some remarks on covariant completely positive linear maps on C*-algebras,” Rep. Math. Phys. 16, 79–87 (1979).
21.M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, “Exact antiferromagnetic ground states of quantum spin chains,” Europhys. Lett. 10, 633–637 (1989).
22.A. O. Barut and R. Raczka, Theory of Group Representations and Applications (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
23.D. P. Zhelobenko, “Compact Lie groups and their representations,” Am. Math. Soc. (1978).
24.All representations in this paper are finite dimensional.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...