NOTICE: Scitation Maintenance Sunday, March 1, 2015.

Scitation users may experience brief connectivity issues on Sunday, March 1, 2015 between 12:00 AM and 7:00 AM EST due to planned network maintenance.

Thank you for your patience during this process.

1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
f
Nondisturbing quantum measurements
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658
1.
1.A. Arias, A. Gheondea, and S. Gudder, J. Math. Phys. 43, 5872 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1519669
2.
2.W. Arveson, Acta Math. 128, 271 (1972).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02392166
3.
3.S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
4.
4.O. Bratteli, P. E. T. Jorgensen, A. Kishimoto, and R. F. Werner, J. Oper. Theory 43, 97 (2000).
5.
5.P. Busch and T. Heinosaari, Quantum Inf. Comput. 8, 0797 (2008).
6.
6.S. T. Ali and H. D. Doebner, J. Math. Phys. 17, 1105 (1976).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.523034
7.
7.P. Busch, P. J. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt, The Quantum Theory of Measurement, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).
8.
8.P. Busch and J. Singh, Phys. Lett. A 249, 10 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00704-X
9.
9.E. B. Davies, Quantum Theory of Open Systems (Academic, London, 1976).
10.
10.T. Heinosaari, D. Reitzner, and P. Stano, Found. Phys. 38, 1133 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9256-7
11.
11.G. Lindblad, Lett. Math. Phys. 47, 189 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007581027660
12.
12.L. Weihua and W. Junde, J. Math. Phys. 50, 103531 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3253574
13.
13.M. M. Wolf, Quantum channels and operations. Lecture notes, available in www.nbi.dk/~wolf/notes.pdf, 2010.
14.
14.M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and C. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 230402 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.230402
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658
2010-09-02
2015-03-01

Abstract

We consider pairs of discrete quantum observables (POVMs) and analyze the relation between the notions of nondisturbance, joint measurability, and commutativity. We specify conditions under which these properties coincide or differ—depending, for instance, on the interplay between the number of outcomes and the Hilbert space dimension or on algebraic properties of the effect operators. We also show that (non-)disturbance is, in general, not a symmetric relation and that it can be decided and quantified by means of a semidefinite program.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/1.3480658.html;jsessionid=26e2lq7adool1.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jmp
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Nondisturbing quantum measurements
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jmp/51/9/10.1063/1.3480658
10.1063/1.3480658
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM