No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Measurement uncertainty relations
4. H. Weyl, Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik (Hirzel, Leipzig, 1928).
10. J. Erhart, S. Sponar, G. Sulyok, G. Badurek, M. Ozawa, and Y. Hasegawa, “Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements,” Nat. Phys. 8, 185–189 (2012).
11. L. Rozema, A. Darabi, D. Mahler, A. Hayat, Y. Soudagar, and A. Steinberg, “Violation of Heisenberg's measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012).
12. P. Busch
, P. Lahti
, and R. Werner
, “Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations
,” Rev. Mod. Phys. (unpublished); preprint arXiv:1312.4393
14. R. F. Werner, “The uncertainty relation for joint measurement of position and momentum,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 546–562 (2004).
15. E. Davies, Quantum Theory of Open Systems (Academic Press, 1976).
16. A. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).
18. K. Husimi, “Some formal properties of the density matrix,” Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Jpn. 22, 264 (1940).
19. G. Cassinelli, E. De Vito, and A. Toigo, “Positive operator valued measures covariant with respect to an irreducible representation,” J. Math. Phys. 44, 4768–4775 (2003).
24. C. Villani, Optimal Transport: Old and New (Springer, 2009).
25. T. Champion, L. D. Pascale, and P. Juutinen, “The ∞-Wasserstein distance: Local solutions and existence of optimal transport maps,” SIAM J. Math. Anal. 40, 1–20 (2008).
26. P. Jylhä, “The l∞ optimal transport: Infinite cyclical monotonicity and the existence of optimal transport maps,” Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equations February, 1–24 (2014).
31. M. G. Cowling and J. F. Price, “Bandwidth versus time concentration: The Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl inequality,” SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15, 151–165 (1984).
33. B. Simon, Trace Ideals and Their Applications, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series Vol. 35 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. viii+134.
34. E. B. Davies, One-Parameter Semigroups, London Mathematical Society Monographs Vol. 15 (Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], London, 1980), pp. viii+230.
35. M. Keyl, D. Schlingemann, and R. F. Werner, “Infinitely entangled states,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 281–306 (2003).
36. N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. Part I, Wiley Classics Library (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1988), pp. xiv+858 [General Theory, With the assistance of William G. Bade and Robert G. Bartle, Reprint of the 1958 original, A Wiley-Interscience Publication].
37. N. Bourbaki, General Topology, Part I (Herrmann, Paris, 1966).
39. E. Schrödinger, “Zum Heisenbergschen Unschärfeprinzip,” Berliner Berichte 19, 296–303 (1930).
40. J. Schultz, J. Kiukas, and R. F. Werner, “Quantum harmonic analysis on locally compact Abelian groups,” (unpublished).
41. O. Sachse, “Unschärferelation für diskrete Observable,” B.Sc. thesis, Hannover, 2013.
44. P. Coles
and F. Furrer
, “Entropic formulation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation
,” preprint arXiv:1311.7637
46. D. Reeb, private communication, IMS Singapore (Summer 2013).
Article metrics loading...
Measurement uncertainty relations are quantitative bounds on the errors in an approximate joint measurement of two observables. They can be seen as a generalization of the error/disturbance tradeoff first discussed heuristically by Heisenberg. Here we prove such relations for the case of two canonically conjugate observables like position and momentum, and establish a close connection with the more familiar preparation uncertainty relations constraining the sharpness of the distributions of the two observables in the same state. Both sets of relations are generalized to means of order α rather than the usual quadratic means, and we show that the optimal constants are the same for preparation and for measurement uncertainty. The constants are determined numerically and compared with some bounds in the literature. In both cases, the near-saturation of the inequalities entails that the state (resp. observable) is uniformly close to a minimizing one.
Full text loading...
Most read this month