No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Quantum correlations and distinguishability of quantum states
1. B. Aaronson, R. L. Franco, and G. Adesso, “Comparative investigation of the freezing phenomena for quantum correlations under nondissipative decoherence,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 012120 (2013).
7. K. M. R. Audenaert, J. Calsamiglia, R. Muñoz-Tapia, E. Bagan, L. I. Masanes, A. Acin, and F. Verstraete, “Discriminating States: The Quantum Chernoff Bound,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160501 (2007).
11. H. Araki and T. Masudai, “Positive cones and Lp-spaces for von Neumann algebras,” Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ. 18, 339–411 (1982).
14. R. Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics: Methods and Applications of Statistical Physics (Springer, 2007), Vol. 1.
15. M. Ban, K. Kurokawa, R. Momose, and O. Hirota, “Optimum measurements for discrimination among symmetric quantum states and parameter estimation,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 1269–1288 (1997).
19. H. Barnum and E. Knill, “Reversing quantum dynamics with near-optimal quantum and classical fidelity,” J. Math. Phys. 43, 2097–2106 (2002).
20. I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski, Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
24. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, “Quantum nonlocality without entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
26. J. A. Bergou, U. Herzog, and M. Hillery, “Discrimination of quantum states,” in Quantum State Estimation, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 649, edited by M. Paris and J. Rehacek (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 417–465.
27. R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis (Springer, 1991).
28. The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation, edited by D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger (Springer, 2000).
29. O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Springer, Berlin, 1997), Vols. 1 and 2.
31. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2002).
32. D. Bures, “An extension of Kakutani's theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*-algebras,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135, 199–212 (1969).
33. E. A. Carlen, “Trace inequalities and quantum entropy: An introductory course,” in Entropy and the quantum, Contemporary Mathematics, edited by R. Sims and D. Ueltschi, Vol. 529 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010).
35. N. N. Cencov, Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Interferences, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 53 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1982).
39. K. Chen and L.-A. Wu, “A matrix realignment method for recognizing entanglement,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 193–202 (2003).
42. R. B. M. Clarke, V. M. Kendon, A. Chefles, S. M. Barnett, E. Riis, and M. Sasaki, “Experimental realization of optimal detection strategies for overcomplete states,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 012303 (2001).
53. R. Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 2nd ed. (Duxbury Press, USA, 1996).
54. Y. C. Eldar and G. D. Forney Jr., “On quantum detection and the square-root measurement,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 858–872 (2001).
55. Y. C. Eldar, A. Megretski, and G. C. Verghese, “Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49, 1007–1012 (2003).
58. F. F. Fanchini, M. F. Cornelio, M. C. de Oliveira, and A. O. Caldeira, “Conservation law for distributed entanglement of formation and quantum discord,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 012313 (2011).
64. D. Giulini et al., Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, 1996).
65. C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Estève, and M. K. Oberthaler, “Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit,” Nature 464, 1165 (2010).
66. M. Gu, H. M. Chrzanowski, S. M. Assad, T. Symul, K. Modi, T. C. Ralph, V. Vedral, and P. Koy Lam, “Observing the operational significance of discord consumption,” Nat. Phys. 8, 671 (2012).
70. S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities and Photons (Oxford University Press, 2006).
72. P. Hausladen, R. Jozsa, B. Schumacher, M. Westmoreland, and W. K. Wootters, “Classical information capacity of a quantum channel,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1869–1876 (1996).
73. P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter, “Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality,” Commun. Math. Phys. 246, 359–374 (2004).
74. C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976).
76. F. Hiai and D. Petz, “The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in quantum probability,” Commun. Math. Phys. 143, 99–114 (1991).
78. A. S. Holevo, “On asymptotically optimal hypothesis testing in quantum statistics,” Theory Probab. Appl. 23, 411–415 (1979).
87. V. Jakšić, Y. Ogata, C.-A. Pillet, and R. Seiringer, “Quantum hypothesis testing and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics,” Rev. Math. Phys. 24(6), 1230002 (2012).
88. V. Jakšić and C.-A. Pillet, “Entropic functionals in quantum statistical mechanics,” in Proceedings of XVIIth International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Aalborg, 2012 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013), pp. 336–343.
99. E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, “Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy,” J. Math. Phys. 14, 1938–1941 (1973).
100. E. H. Lieb and W. Thirring, “Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities,” in Studies in Mathematical Physics: Essays in Honor of Valentine Bargman, edited by E. H. Lieb, B. Simon, A. S. Wightman (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976), pp. 269–297.
106. V. Madhok
and A. Datta
, “Role of quantum discord in quantum communication
,” e-print arXiv:1107.0994
110. K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, and V. Vedral, “The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655–1707 (2012).
111. M. Mohseni, A. M. Steinberg, and J. A. Bergou, “Optical realization of optimal unambiguous discrimination for pure and mixed quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 200403 (2004).
112. A. Montanaro, “A lower bound on the probability of error in quantum state discrimination,” in Proceedings of IEEE Information Theory Workshop ITW'08 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2008), p. 378.
113. E. A. Morozova and N. N. Chentsov, “Markov invariant geometry on state manifolds (in Russian),” Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki 36, 69–102 (1990).
114. M. Müller-Lennert, F. Dupuis, O. Szehr, S. Fehr, and M. Tomamichel, “On quantum Rényi entropies: a new generalization and some properties,” J. Math. Phys. 54, 122203 (2013).
117. N. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
118. M. Nussbaum and A. Szkola, “The Chernoff lower bound for symmetric quantum hypothesis testing,” The Annals of Statistics (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009), Vol. 37, pp. 1040–1057.
119. M. Ohya and D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and its Use (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1993).
121. T. Ogawa and H. Nagaoka, “Strong converse and Stein's lemma in quantum hypothesis testing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46(7), 2428–2433 (2000).
123. G. Passante, O. Moussa, D. A. Trottier, and R. Laflamme, “Experimental detection of nonclassical correlations in mixed-state quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 044302 (2011).
127. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995).
133. F. Riedel, P. Böhi, Y. Li, T. W. Hänsch, A. Sinatra, and P. Treutlein, “Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology,” Nature 464, 1170 (2010).
134. W. Roga
, S. M. Giampaolo
, and F. Illuminati
, “Discord of response
,” e-print arXiv:1401.8243
151. W. F. Stinespring, “Positive functions on C*-algebras,” Proc. Am. Soc. 6, 211–216 (1955).
153. A. Uhlmann, “Endlich-dimensionale Dichtematrizen II,” Wiss. Z. Karl-Marx-Univ. Leipzig, Math.-Nat R. 22, 139–177 (1973).
155. A. Uhlmann, “Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 54, 21–32 (1977).
162. S. Vogelsberger, “Dynamique des systèmes quantiques ouverts: décohérence et perte d'intrication (in French),” Ph.D. thesis (University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, 2012).
163. W. Wasilewski, K. Jensen, H. Krauter, J. J. Renema, M. V. Balabas, and E. S. Polzik, “Quantum noise limited and entanglement-assisted magnetometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 133601 (2010).
166. M. M. Wilde
, A. Winter
, and D. Yang
, “Strong converse for the classical capacity of entanglement-breaking and Hadamard channels via a sandwiched Renyi relative entropy
,” e-print arXiv:1306.1586
Article metrics loading...
A survey of various concepts in quantum information is given, with a main emphasis on the distinguishability of quantum states and quantum correlations. Covered topics include generalized and least square measurements, state discrimination, quantum relative entropies, the Bures distance on the set of quantum states, the quantum Fisher information, the quantum Chernoff bound, bipartite entanglement, the quantum discord, and geometrical measures of quantum correlations. The article is intended both for physicists interested not only by collections of results but also by the mathematical methods justifying them, and for mathematicians looking for an up-to-date introductory course on these subjects, which are mainly developed in the physics literature.
Full text loading...
Most read this month