1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Study of the influence of vane angle on shaft output of a multivane air turbine
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3424712
/content/aip/journal/jrse/2/3/10.1063/1.3424712
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jrse/2/3/10.1063/1.3424712

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Air turbine model.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Thermodynamic processes (isobaric, adiabatic, and isochoric expansions).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Variable length BG and IH and injection angle .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Variation in expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 30° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Percentage contribution of expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 30° and speed is 2500 rpm

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Variation in flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 30° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Percentage contribution of flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 30° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Variation in total turbine work output vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 30° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Variation in expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 45° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Percentage contribution of expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 45° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Variation in flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 45° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Percentage contribution of flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 45° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Variation in total turbine work output vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 45° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Variation in expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 60° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Percentage contribution of expansion work vs different vane angles at different injection pressure when injection angle is 60° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Variation in flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 60° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

Percentage contribution of flow work vs different vane angles at different injection pressure when injection angle is 60° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

Variation in total turbine work output vs different vane angles at different injection pressures when injection angle is 60° and speed is 2500 rpm.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Input parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jrse/2/3/10.1063/1.3424712
2010-05-06
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Study of the influence of vane angle on shaft output of a multivane air turbine
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jrse/2/3/10.1063/1.3424712
10.1063/1.3424712
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM