Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. IEA, World Energy Outlook - 2009. Retrieved January 2010(International Energy Agency, 2009).
2. A. K. Akella, M. Sharma, and R. Saini, “Otimum utilization of renewable energysources in a remote area,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 11, 894908 (2007).
3. M. R. Nouni, S. Mullick, and T. Kandpal, “Techno-economics of small wind electricgenerator projects for decentralized power supply in India,” EnergyPolicy 35, 24912506 (2007).
4. U. Bawah, K.E. Addoweesh, and A.M. Eltamaly, “Economic modeling of site-specificoptimum wind turbine for electrification studies,” Adv. Mater. Res. 347–353, 19731986 (2012).
5. F. A. L. Jowder, “Wind power analysis and site matching ofwind turbine generators in Kingdom of Bahrain,” Appl. Energy. 86, 538545 (2009).
6. M. H. Albadi and E.F. El-Saadany, “Optimum turbine-sitematching,” Energy 35, 35933602 (2010).
7. S. Rehman, “Solar radiation over Saudi Arabia andcomparisons with empirical models,” Energy 23(12), 10771082(1998).
8. S. Diaf, M. Belhamel, M. Haddadi, and A. Louche, “Technical and economic assessment of hybridphotovoltaic/wind system with battery storage in Corsica island,” EnergyPolicy 36, 743754 (2008).
9. A. Malik and A.H. Al-Badi, “Economics of wind turbine as an energyfuel saver - A case study for remote application in Oman,” Energy 34, 15731578 (2009).
10. S. Rehman, M.M. Alam, J.P. Meyer, and L.M. Al-Hadhrami, “Feasibility study of wind-pv-dieselhybrid power systems for a village,” Renewable Energy 38, 258268 (2012).
11. I. Flavius and B. Viorel, “The potential of the local administrationas driving force for the implementation of the national PV systems strategy inRomania,” Renewable Energy 38(1), 117125(2012).
12. PKF, Saudi Arabia Tax Guide 2009(PKF, 2009).
13. Joint Technical Committee EL-042 (2010). Australian/NewZealand Standard AS/NZS 4509.2:2010 (Standards Australia Limited/Standard New Zealand).
14. KPMG, “Image study diesel power plants: Study on image andactual potential of engine-based power plant.,” KPMG, 2010.
15. Institute for Energy and Research, Levelized cost of generatingtechnologies (Institute for Energy and Research, 2009). See also at
16. L. Lu, H. Yang, and J. Burnet, “Investigation on wind power potential onHong Kong islands - an analysis of wind power and wind turbine characteristics,” Renewable Energy 27, 112 (2002).
17. G. L. Johnson, Wind Energy Systems(Prentice-Hall, 1985).
18. M. El-Shimy, “Optimal site matching of wind turbinegenerator: Case study of the Gulf of Suez region, Egypt,” RenewableEnergy 35, 18701878 (2010).
19. A. Oguz, “Technoeconomic analysis of electricitygeneration from wind energy in Kutahya, Turkey,” Energy 35, 120131 (2010).
20. B. Mark and W. Ryan, “Understanding trends in wind turbine pricesover the past decade,” Lawrence Barkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-5119E, 2011. Seealso at
21. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Cost and Performance Data for PowerGeneration Technologies (Black & Veatch, 2012).
22. M. David, “Breaking down the cost of wind turbinemaintenance,” Wind Power Monthly (15 June 2010);available online at
23. A. Luque and S. Hegedus, Handbook of Photovoltaic Science andEngineering (Wiley, 2011).
24. S. Walter, J.P. Daniel, and H. Thomas, A Manual for the Economic Evaluation of EnergyEfficiency and Renewable Energy Technologies (National Renewable EnergyLaboratory, 1995).
25. A. R. Stephen, W.W. Randolph and D.J. Bradford, Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 5th ed. (Irwin MCGraw-Hill, 2000).
26. See for Saudi Arabia Inflationrate, Trading Economics, 2012.
27. E. K. Donald and J.W. Jerry, Intermediate Accounting, 9thed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NewYork, 1998).
28. See for Saudi Electricity Co: Amonopoly undermined by margin pressure, NCB Capital, 2009.
29. See;ectricity/levelized_cost.html for California EnergyCommission, Energy ALMANAC, 2010.
30. I. B. Maria, “The economics of windenergy,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 13, 13721382 (2009).
31. G. Murat and S.G. Mustafa, “Evaluation of electricity generation andenergy cost of wind energy conversion systems (WECSs) in Central Turkey,” Appl. Energy 86, 27473912747392 (2009).
32. See for Solar Buzz, PV module price trend, 2012.
33. See for PHOTON module price index, 2012.
34. Exxon Mobil, The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2030(Exxon Mobil, 2010).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The objective of this paper is to assess the economic viability of Saudi Arabia's renewable energy resources in electricityproduction in the rural and remote areas as against the use of diesel generators (DG). The methodologyemployed is to pick an existing isolated DG electric station for a rural community and assess thelevelized cost of energy (LCOE) generated for incremental generation by adding either DG, wind electric conversion system(WECS), or solar Photo Voltaic (PV) electric system. Cost figures are derived from current technology price indices andconsultancies studies as contained in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory cost report of November 2012. The existingpower station of Addfa in the Southern region is analyzed based on the requirement to increase itscurrent capacity to caterfor surrounding smaller communities. An annual extra energy requirement of 4 GWh is to be met by scenarios ofusing DG, WECS, PV or ahybrid system. Two ownership structures are considered namely a public utility that pays no tax anda private independent power producer (IPP) that pays tax. Both the constant and current LCOE generated are determined for eachownership structure. The results indicate that the WECS is the first investment choice with aconstant LCOE of $0.0922/kWh and $0.1090/kWh for the public utility and the IPP, respectively. TheDG is the second choice with LCOE of $0.1082/kWh and $0.1175/kWh, the third is a hybrid DG plus WECSwith LCOE of $0.1102/kWh and $0.1234/kWh for each ownership structure, respectively. Finally, thePV electric system ranksfourth with LCOE of $0.2791/kWh and $0.3279/kWh, respectively. The results of sensitivity analysisshow that these values of LCOE are more sensitive to the initial capital cost and less sensitive tothe operation and management costs.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd