No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
3D stall delay effect modeling and aerodynamic analysis of swept-blade wind turbine
1. S. M. Larwood, Dynamic Analysis Tool Development for Advanced Geometry Wind Turbine Blades (University of California, 2009).
2. R. Amano and R. Malloy, “CFD analysis on aerodynamic design optimization of wind turbine rotor blades,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 60, 71–75 (2009).
3. K. Suzuki, S. Schmitz, and J.-J. Chattot, Analysis of a Swept Wind Turbine Blade Using a Hybrid Navier–Stokes/Vortex-Panel Model, Computational Fluid Dynamics 2010 (Springer, 2011), pp. 213–218.
4. T. Maggio, F. Grasso, and D. Coiro, Numerical Study on Performance of Innovative Wind Turbine Blade for Load Reduction, EWEA, EWEC2011 (Bruxelles, 2011), pp.14–17.
5. D. R. Verelst and T. J. Larsen, Load Consequences When Sweeping Blades-A Case Study of a 5 MW Pitch Controlled Wind Turbine (Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Risø Nationallaboratoriet for Bæredygtig Energi, 2010).
6. H. Snel, R. Houwink, J. Bosschers, and E. C. Nederland, Sectional Prediction of Lift Coefficients on Rotating Wind Turbine Blades in Stall (Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, 1994).
7. P. Chaviaropoulos and M. O. L. Hansen, “Investigating three-dimensional and rotational effects on wind turbine blades by means of a quasi-3D Navier-Stokes solver,” J. Fluids Eng. 122, 330–336 (2000).
8. Z. Du and M. Selig, “A 3-D Stall-Delay Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Performance Prediction. AIAA-98-0021,” in 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1998 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Reno (NV, USA, 1998).
9. J. Corrigan and J. Schillings, “Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation,” in American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialists Conference (San Francisco, CA, 1994).
10. C. Lindenburg, “Investigation into rotor blade aerodynamics,” Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, Report ECN-C–0–025, 2003.
11. G. P. Corten and E. C. Nederland, “Inviscid Stall Model,” in Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference: Netherlands Energy Research Foundation (2001), pp. 466–469.
12. J. G. Leishman and T. S. Beddoes, “A generalised model for airfoil unsteady aerodynamic behaviour and dynamic stall using the indicial method,” in 42th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society (Washington, 1986), pp. 243–265.
13. C. Lindenburg, “Investigation into rotor blade aerodynamics,” Netherlands Society for Energy and the Environment, Paper ECN-C-03-025, 2003.
14. W. Sheng, R. A. M. D. Galbraith, and F. N. Coton, “On the S809 airfoil's unsteady aerodynamic characteristics,” Wind Energy 12, 752–767 (2009).
15. M. M. Hand, D. Simms, L. Fingersh, D. Jager, and J. Cotrell, Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase V: Test Configuration and Available Data Campaigns (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2001).
16. S. Guntur, C. Bak, and N. N. Sørensen, “Analysis of 3D Stall Models for Wind Turbine Blades Using Data from the MEXICO Experiment,” in 13th International conference on Wind Engineering, ICWE (Amsterdam Holland, 2012).
17. S. Schreck, T. Sant, and D. Micallef, “Rotational Augmentation Disparities in the Mexico and Uae Phase VI Experiments,” in 3rd Torque 2010 The Science of making Torque from Wind Conference (FORTH, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2010).
18. J. G. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
19. M. Ramasamy and J. G. Leishman, “A generalized model for transitional blade tip vortices,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 51, 92–103 (2006).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month