No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Large eddy simulation studies of the effects of alignment and wind farm length
1.World Wind Energy Association, Half-year report 2011, August 2011.
2.Commission of the European Communities, A European strategic energy technology plan—technology map, 2007.
3. U.S. Department of Energy, 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply (U.S. Department of Energy, 2008).
4. D. Keith, J. DeCarolis, D. Denkenberger, D. Lenschow, S. Malyshev, S. Pacala, and P. J. Rasch, “ The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16115 (2004).
6. S. Baidya-Roy, S. W. Pacala, and R. L. Walko, “ Can large scale wind farms affect local meteorology?,” J. Geophys. Res. 109, D19101, doi:10.1029/2004JD004763 (2004).
8. L. Zhou, Y. Tian, S. Baidya-Roy, C. Thorncroft, L. F. Bosart, and Y. Hu, “ Impacts of wind farms on land surface temperature,” Nat. Clim. Change 2, 539 (2012).
9. B. Sanderse, S. P. van der Pijl, and B. Koren, “ Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics,” Wind Energy 14, 799 (2011).
12. Á. Jiménez, A. Crespo, and E. Migoya, “ Application of a LES technique to characterize the wake deflection of a wind turbine in yaw,” Wind Energy 13, 559 (2010).
13. M. Calaf, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, “ Large eddy simulations of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers,” Phys. Fluids 22, 015110 (2010).
14. S. Ivanell, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanics, Gotland University, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
16. M. J. Churchfield, S. Lee, P. J. Moriarty, L. A. Martínez, S. Leonardi, G. Vijayakumar, and J. G. Brasseur, “ A large-eddy simulation of wind-plant aerodynamics,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0537, 2012.
17. J.-O. Mo, A. Choudhry, M. Arjomandi, and Y.-H. Lee, “ Large eddy simulation of the wind turbine wake characteristics in the numerical wind tunnel model,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 112, 11 (2013).
19. L. A. Martínez, S. Leonardi, M. Churchfield, and P. Moriarty, “ A comparison of actuator disk and actuator line wind turbine models and best practices for their use,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0900, 2012.
20. J. E. Cater, S. E. Norris, and R. C. Storey, “ Comparison of wind turbine actuator methods using large eddy simulation,” 18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference Launceston, Australia 3–7 December 2012.
21. N. Troldborg, J. Sørensen, and R. Mikkelsen, “ Numerical simulations of wake characteristics of a wind turbine in uniform inflow,” Wind Energy 13, 86 (2010).
22. N. Troldborg, G. C. Larsen, H. A. Madsen, K. S. Hansen, J. N. Sørensen, and R. Mikkelsen, “ Numerical simulations of wake interaction between two wind turbines at various inflow conditions,” Wind Energy 14, 859 (2011).
23. R. C. Storey, S. E. Norris, K. A. Stol, and J. E. Cater, “ Large eddy simulation of dynamically controlled wind turbines in an offshore environment,” Wind Energy 16, 845–864 (2013).
24. M. J. Churchfield, S. Lee, J. Michalakes, and P. J. Moriarty, “ A numerical study of the effects of atmospheric and wake turbulence on wind turbine dynamics,” J. Turbul. 13, N14 (2012).
25. S. Lee, M. Churchfield, P. Moriarty, J. Jonkman, and J. Michalakes, “ Atmospheric and wake turbulence impacts on wind turbine fatigue loadings,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0540, 2012.
26. J. Meyers and C. Meneveau, “ Large eddy simulations of large wind-turbine arrays in the atmospheric boundary layer,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition AIAA 2010-0827, 2010.
27. M. Calaf, M. B. Parlange, and C. Meneveau, “ Large eddy simulation study of scalar transport in fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers,” Phys. Fluids 23, 126603 (2011).
28. R. Cal, J. Lebrón, L. Castillo, H. Kang, and C. Meneveau, “ Experimental study of the horizontally averaged flow structure in a model wind-turbine array boundary layer,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2, 013106 (2010).
29. Y.-T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, “ Simulation of turbulent flow inside and above wind farms: model validation and layout effects,” Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 146, 181 (2013).
31. X. Yang, S. Kang, and F. Sotiropoulos, “ Computational study and modeling of turbine spacing effects in infinite aligned wind farms,” Phys. Fluids 24, 115107 (2012).
32. R. J. Barthelmie, K. Hansen, S. T. Frandsen, O. Rathmann, J. G. Schepers, W. Schlez, J. Phillips, K. Rados, A. Zervos, E. S. Politis, and P. Chaviaropoulos, “ Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore,” Wind Energy 12, 431 (2009).
33. Y. T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, “ Modeling turbine wakes and power losses within a wind farm using LES: An application to the Horns Rev offshore wind farm,” in International Conference on Aerodynamics of Offshore Wind Energy Systems and Wakes (ICOWES2013) (2013), p. 537.
34. C. L. Archer, S. Mirzaeisefat, and S. Lee, “ Quantifying the sensitivity of wind farm performance to array layout options using large-eddy simulation,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4963, doi:10.1002/grl.50911 (2013).
35. R. J. A. M. Stevens, J. Graham, and C. Meneveau, “ A concurrent precursor inflow method for large eddy simulations and applications to finite length wind farms,” Renewable Energy 68, 46–50 (2014).
36. E. Bou-Zeid, C. Meneveau, and M. B. Parlange, “ A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids 17, 025105 (2005).
38. J. Meyers and C. Meneveau, “ Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers,” Wind Energy 15, 305 (2012).
39. T. Burton, D. Sharpe, N. Jenkins, and E. Bossanyi, Wind Energy Handbook (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).
40. R. J. A. M. Stevens, D. F. Gayme, and C. Meneveau, “ Effect of turbine placement on the average power output of finite length wind farms,” in International Conference on Aerodynamics of Offshore Wind Energy Systems and Wakes (ICOWES2013), (2013), p. 611.
41. R. Barthelmie, S. Frandsen, O. Rathmann, K. Hansen, E. Politis, J. Prospathopoulos, J. Schepers, K. Rados, D. Cabezøn, W. Schlez, A. Neubert, and M. Heath, Flow and wakes in large wind farms: Final report for Up Wind WP8, Report No. Ris-R-1765(EN), 2011.
42. J. Newman, J. Lebron, C. Meneveau, and L. Castillo, “ Streamwise development of the wind turbine boundary layer over a model wind turbine array,” Phys. Fluids 25, 085108 (2013).
44. S. McTavish, D. Feszty, and F. Nitzsche, “ An experimental and computational assessment of blockage effects on wind turbine wake development,” Wind Energy (published online, 2013).
45. D. J. Renkema, Master's thesis, Delft University, The Netherlands, 2007.
46. K. S. Hansen, R. J. Barthelmie, L. E. Jensen, and A. Sommer, “ The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm,” Wind Energy 15, 183 (2012).
47. N. O. Jensen, A note on wind generator interaction, Risø-M-2411, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, 1984.
48. I. Katić, J. Højstrup, and N. O. Jensen, “ A simple model for cluster efficiency,” in European Wind Energy Association Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy, 7–9 October, 1986.
49. J. Wieringa, A. Davenport, C. Grimmond, and T. R. Oke, “ New revision of Davenport Roughness classification,” in 3rd European & African Conference on Wind Engineering (3EACWE), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2001.
Article metrics loading...
Large eddy simulations of wind farms are performed to study the effects of wind turbine row alignment with respect to the incoming flow direction. Various wind farms with fixed stream-wise spacing (7.85 rotor diameters) and varying lateral displacements and span-wise turbine spacings are considered, for a fixed inflow direction. Simulations show that, contrary to common belief, a perfectly staggered (checker-board) configuration does not necessarily give the highest average power output. Instead, the highest mean wind farm power output is found to depend on several factors, the most important one being the alignment that leads to minimization of wake effects from turbines in several upstream rows. This alignment typically occurs at significantly smaller angles than those corresponding to perfect staggering. The observed trends have implications for wind farm designs, especially in sites with a well-defined prevailing wind direction.
Full text loading...
Most read this month