Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. J. F. Manwell, J. G. McGowan, and A. L. Rogers, Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, 2nd ed. ( John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2009).
2. A. Segalini and P. H. Alfredsson, “ A simplified vortex model of propeller and wind-turbine wakes,” J. Fluid Mech. 725, 91116 (2013).
3. S. Sarmast, A. Segalini, R. F. Mikkelsen, and S. Ivanell, “ Comparison of the near-wake between actuator line simulations and a simplified vortex model of a horizontal-axis wind turbine,” Wind Energy (published online 2015).
4. D. Medici, S. Ivanell, J. A. Dahlberg, and P. H. Alfredsson, “ The upstream flow of a wind turbine: Blockage effect,” Wind Energy 14, 691697 (2011).
5. E. Simley, L. Y. Pao, P. Gebraad, and M. Churchfleld, “ Investigation of the impact of the upstream induction zone on LIDAR measurement accuracy for wind turbine control applications using large-eddy simulation,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 524, 012003 (2014).
6. A. Tindal, C. Johnson, M. LeBlanc, K. Harman, E. Rareshide, and A. Graves, “ Site-specific adjustments to wind turbine power curves,” paper presented at the American Wind Energy Association WINDPOWER Conference, Houston, TX, 2008.
7.IEC 61400-12-1, Power Performance Measurements of Electricity Producing Wind Turbines, 1st ed. ( International Elec-trotechnical Commission, 2005).
8. K. Modarresi and R. H. Kirchhoff, “ The flow field upstream of a horizontal axis wind turbine,” Wind Energy Center Reports, Paper 10, University of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center, Amherst, MA, 1979.
9. C. Slinger, M. Leak, M. Pitter, and M. Harris, “ Relative power curve measurements using turbine mounted, continuous-wave lidar,” in Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Association 2013 Annual Event, Vienna, Austria, 2013.
10. M. Asimakopoulos, P. Clive, G. More, and R. Boddington, “ Offshore compression zone measurement and visualization,” paper presented at the European Wind Energy Association 2014 Annual Event, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
11. J. Mann, J.-P. Cariou, M. S. Courtney, R. Parmentier, T. Mikkelsen, R. Wagner, P. Lindelöw, M. Sjöholm, and K. Enevoldsen, “ Comparison of 3D turbulence measurements using three staring wind lidars and a sonic anemometer,” Meteorol. Z. 18, 135140 (2009).
12. F. Carbajo Fuertes, G. V. Iungo, and F. Portè-Agel, “ 3D turbulence measurements using three synchronous wind lidars: Validation against sonic anemometry,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31, 15491556 (2014).
13. G. V. Iungo and F. Portè-Agel, “ Field measurements of wind turbine wakes with lidars,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 30, 274287 (2013).
14. M. Sjöholm, N. Angelou, P. Hansen, K. H. Hansen, T. Mikkelsen, H. Steinar, J. A. Silgjerd, and N. Starsmore, “ Two-dimensional rotorcraft downwash flow field measurements by lidar-based wind scanners with agile beam steering,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31, 930937 (2014).
15. N. Vasiljevic, “ A time-space synchronization of coherent Doppler scanning lidars for 3D measurements of wind fields,” Ph.D. dissertation ( Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark, 2014).
16.Vestas V27-225 kW, 50 Hz wind turbine with tubular/lattice tower—general specification, Item no. 941129, version, Vestas, 1994.
17. S. M. Petersen, “ Wind turbine test—Vestas V27-225 kW,” Technical Report No. Risø-M-2861, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark, 1990.
18. T. Mikkelsen, J. Mann, M. M. Courtney, and M. Sjöholm, “ Windscanner: 3-D wind and turbulence measurements from three steerable Doppler lidars,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1, 012018 (2008).
19. N. Angelou, J. Mann, M. Sjöholm, and M. Courtney, “ Direct measurement of the spectral transfer function of a laser based anemometer,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 033111 (2012).
20. N. Angelou, F. F. Abari, J. Mann, T. Mikkelsen, and M. Sjöholm, “ Challenges in noise removal from Doppler spectra acquired by a continuous-wave lidar,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Laser Radar Conference, Porto Heli, Greece, 2012.
21. P. J. M. Clive, “ Compensation of vector and volume averaging bias in lidar wind speed measurements,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1, 012036 (2008).
22. E. Simley, L. Y. Pao, R. Frehlich, B. Jonkman, and N. Kelley, “ Analysis of light detection and ranging wind speed measurements for wind turbine control,” Wind Energy 17, 413433 (2014).
23. J. C. Wyngaard, Turbulence in the Atmosphere ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



As a wind turbine generates power, induced velocities, lower than the freestream velocity, will be present upstream of the turbine due to perturbation of the flow by the rotor. In this study, the upstream induction zone of a 225 kW horizontal axis Vestas V27 wind turbine located at the Danish Technical University's Risø campus is investigated using a scanning Light Detection and Ranging(lidar) system. Three short-range continuous-wave “WindScanner” lidars are positioned in the field around the V27 turbine allowing detection of all three components of the wind velocity vectors within the induction zone. The time-averaged mean wind speeds at different locations in the upstream induction zone are measured by scanning a horizontal plane at hub height and a vertical plane centered at the middle of the rotor extending roughly 1.5 rotor diameters () upstream of the rotor. Turbulence statistics in the induction zone are studied by more rapidly scanning along individual lines perpendicular to the rotor at different radial distances from the hub. The mean velocity measurements reveal that the longitudinal velocity reductions become greater closer to the rotor plane and closer to the center of the rotor. Velocity deficits of 1%–3% of the freestream value were observed 1 upstream of the rotor, increasing at the rotor plane to 7.4% near the edge of the rotor and 18% near the center of the rotor while the turbine was operating with a high estimated mechanical coefficient of power () of 0.56 yielding an estimated axial induction factor of 0.25. The velocity reductions relative to the freestream velocity become smaller when the turbine's coefficient of power decreases; for a low of 0.16 resulting in an estimated induction factor of 0.04, the velocity deficits are ∼1% of the freestream value 1 upstream of the rotor and only 6% at the rotor plane near the center of the rotor. Additionally, the mean radial wind speeds were found to increase close to the edge of the rotor disk indicating an expansion of the incoming flow around the rotor. Radial velocity magnitudes at the edge of the rotor disk of approximately 9% and 3% of the freestream longitudinal wind speed were measured for the abovementioned high and low values, respectively. Turbulence statistics, calculated using 2.5-min time series, suggest that the standard deviation of the longitudinal wind component decreases close to the rotor, while the standard deviation of the radial wind component appears to increase. When the turbine was operating with a high of 0.54 resulting in an estimated induction factor of 0.22, standard deviation decreases of up to 22% of the estimated freestream value and increases of up to 46% were observed for the longitudinal and radial components, respectively, near the center of the rotor.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd