Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515
1.
1. J. M. Carrasco, L. G. Franquelo, and J. T. Bialasiewicz et al., “ Power-electronic systems for the grid integration of renewable energy sources: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 53, 10021016 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2006.878356
2.
2. Z. Yang, Z. Wang, and P. Ran et al., “ Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid thermal-compressed air energy storage system for the integration of wind power,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 66, 519527 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.043
3.
3. H. Safaei and D. W. Keith, “ Compressed air energy storage with waste heat export: An Alberta case study,” Energy Convers. Manage. 78, 114124 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.043
4.
4. Y. Li, X. Wang, and D. Li et al., “ A trigeneration system based on compressed air and thermal energy storage,” Appl. Energy 99, 316323 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.048
5.
5. L. Nielsen and R. Leithner, “ Dynamic simulation of an innovative compressed air energy storage plant-detailed modelling of the storage cavern,” WSEAS Trans. Power Syst. 4, 253263 (2009).
6.
6. Y. M. Kim, D. G. Shin, and D. Favrat, “ Operating characteristics of constant-pressure compressed air energy storage (CAES) system combined with pumped hydro storage based on energy and exergy analysis,” Energy 36, 62206233 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.040
7.
7. Y. S. H. Najjar and M. S. Zaamout, “ Performance analysis of compressed air energy storage (CAES) plant for dry regions,” Energy Convers. Manage. 39, 15031511 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(98)00034-X
8.
8. J. J. Proczka, K. Muralidharan, and D. Villela et al., “ Guidelines for the pressure and efficient sizing of pressure vessels for compressed air energy storage,” Energy Convers. Manage. 65, 597605 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.09.013
9.
9. Y. Zhang, K. Yang, and X. Li et al., “ The thermodynamic effect of thermal energy storage on compressed air energy storage system,” Renewable Energy 50, 227235 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.052
10.
10. Y. Zhang, K. Yang, and X. Li et al., “ The thermodynamic effect of air storage chamber model on advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system,” Renewable Energy 57, 469478 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.035
11.
11. N. M. Jubeh and Y. S. H. Najjar, “ Power augmentation with CAES (compressed air energy storage) by air injection or supercharging makes environment greener,” Energy 38, 228235 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.12.010
12.
12. N. Hartmann, O. Vöhringer, and C. Kruck et al., “ Simulation and analysis of different adiabatic compressed air energy storage plant configurations,” Appl. Energy 93, 541548 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.007
13.
13. M. Raju and S. K. Khaitan, “ Modeling and simulation of compressed air storage in caverns: A case study of the Huntorfplant,” Appl. Energy 89, 474481 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.019
14.
14. F. Crotogino, K. U. Mohmeyer, and R. Scharf, “ Huntorf CAES: More than 20 years of successful operation,” in Solution Mining Research Institute (SMRI) Spring Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2001.
15.
15. L. Wang, Y. Yang, and T. Morosuk et al., “ Advanced thermodynamic analysis and evaluation of a supercritical power plant,” Energies 5, 18501863 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en5061850
16.
16. E. Açıkkalp, H. Aras, and A. Hepbasli, “ Advanced exergy analysis of a trigeneration system with a diesel-gas engine operating in a refrigerator plant building,” Energy Build. 80, 268275 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.029
17.
17. A. Gungor, G. Tsatsaronis, and H. Gunerhan et al., “ Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of a gas engine heat pump (GEHP) for food drying processes,” Energy Convers. Manage. 91, 132139 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.044
18.
18. G. Tsatsaronis and T. Morosuk, “ Advanced exergetic analysis of a novel system for generating electricity and vaporizing liquefied natural gas,” Energy 35, 820829 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.019
19.
19. Y. Yang, L. Wang, C. Dong, G. Xu, T. Morosuk, and G. Tsatsaronis, “ Comprehensive exergy-based evaluation and parametric study of a coal-fired ultra-supercritical power plant,” Appl. Energy 112, 10871099 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.063
20.
20. L. Wang, Y. Yang, C. Dong, Z. Yang, G. Xu, and L. Wu, “ Exergoeconomic evaluation of a modern ultra-supercritical power plant,” Energies 5(9), 33813397 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en5093381
21.
21. S. Soltani, M. Yari, and S. M. S. Mahmoudi et al., “ Advanced exergy analysis applied to an externally-fired combined-cycle power plant integrated with a biomass gasification unit,” Energy 59, 775780 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.038
22.
22. T. Morosuk and G. Tsatsaronis, “ A new approach to the exergy analysis of absorption refrigeration machines,” Energy 33, 890907 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.09.012
23.
23. C. M. Oldenburg and L. Pan, “ Porous media compressed-air energy storage (PM-CAES): Theory and simulation of the coupled wellbore–reservoir system,” Transp. Porous Media 97(2), 201221 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-012-0118-6
24.
24. P. Zhao, J. Wang, Y. Dai, and L. Gao, “ Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid energy system based on CAES system and CO2 transcritical power cycle with LNG cold energy utilization,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 91, 718730 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.082
25.
25. G. Grazzini and A. Milazzo, “ Thermodynamic analysis of CAES/TES systems for renewable energy plants,” Renewable Energy 33(9), 19982006 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.003
26.
26. G. Grazzini and A. Milazzo, “ A thermodynamic analysis of multistage adiabatic CAES,” Proc. IEEE 100(2), 461472 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2163049
27.
27. M. Phil and S. Kelly, “ Energy systems improvement based on endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universistat, Berlin, 2008.
28.
28. G. Tsatsaronis and M. H. Park, “ On avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs in thermal systems,” Energy Convers. Manage. 43, 12591270 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00012-2
29.
29. F. Petrakopoulou, G. Tsatsaronis, and T. Morosuk et al., “ Conventional and advanced exergetic analyses applied to a combined cycle power plant,” Energy 41, 146152 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.028
30.
30. J. Chen, H. Havtun, and B. Palm, “ Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of an ejector refrigeration system,” Appl. Energy 144, 139151 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.139
31.
31. S. Kelly, G. Tsatsaronis, and T. Morosuk, “ Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts,” Energy 34(3), 384391 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.12.007
32.
32. T. Morosuk, G. Tsatsaronis, and C. Zhang, “ Conventional thermodynamic and advanced exergetic analysis of a refrigeration machine using a Voorhees' compression process,” Energy Convers. Manage. 60, 143151 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.021
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515
2016-05-02
2016-12-07

Abstract

Compressed air energy storage (CAES) is an economic, large-scale energy storage technology, but its further applications are limited by thermodynamic inefficiency. Although high-exergy destruction components can be highlighted through exergy analysis, the interactions among components and the true potential for the improvement of CAES are not obvious. In this study, an advanced exergy analysis was applied to the CAES system. The exergy destruction within each system component was split into four parts, namely, endogenous, exogenous, avoidable, and unavoidable. The thermodynamic properties of CAES were discussed in detail by combining the four parts. Results indicate that the unavoidable part of exergy destruction within the components of the system is larger than the avoidable part. The most important components based on the avoidable exergy destruction are combustion chambers, intercoolers, and aftercoolers. Exergy destruction can be significantly reduced by improving the main component efficiencies. More than half of the avoidable exergy destruction is exogenous, which indicates that interactions among components have a considerable impact on the CAES performance.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/1.4948515.html;jsessionid=8bThEXfzKmw9r-7M5JbkVysK.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jrse
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=jrse.aip.org/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jrse/8/3/10.1063/1.4948515'
Right1,Right2,Right3,