1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Dynamic properties of inhomogeneous states in cuprates (Review Article)
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2199431
/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199431
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199431
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Comparison of the exact ground state energy89 with the GA and method for the half-filled Hubbard model on a system.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Magnetic excitations at and as a function of for a half-filled cluster: (solid line), (dashed line), and exact diagonalization (filled circles and filled squares). The exact diagonalization results for the excitation at are also reported (unfilled squares).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Sketch of bond- and site-centered stripe structures. Only Cu sites are shown. The dashed lines indicate the antiphase domain boundary.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Cross section of charge- and spin densities for BC and SC stripes in the three-band model. Charge (hole) densities are shown as differences between the stripe solution and the homogeneous antiferromagnet. The lowest panels report the double occupancies on Cu.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Electron mean-field bands for the BC stripe of Fig. 4 measured from the chemical potential. Left (right) panel is in the direction perpendicular (parallel) to the stripe. We also plot the insulating charge transfer gap at momentum measured from the same reference energy (dots).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

as a function of (a) and (b) for vertical BC stripes. Sizes are for and for . In (a) we also show the result for (unfilled circles). In (b) we also show the result for site-centered stripes (labeled SC, unfilled symbols) for and one self-trapped hole or “electronic polaron” at . The inset in (b) reports the incommensurability as obtained from the present calculation (line) compared with experimental data from Ref. 12.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Optical conductivity for stripes with the electric field applied perpendicular and parallel to the stripes. computed without the addition of RPA corrections. The corresponding excitations are also indicated in the band structure in Fig. 8 (a); computed within the approach (b).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Electron mean-field bands measured from the chemical potential for momentum in the direction of the stripe (, ). The arrows are the lowest-energy dipole-allowed mean-field transitions in a cluster, labeled by energy and polarization. Notice that the polarization is perpendicular to the stripe. We also plot the energies of the AF insulating bands at momentum (filled dots) measured from the same reference energy.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Optical conductivity labeled by doping, system size and, in the case of stripes, interstripe distance. The units of conductivity are given by with a background dielectric constant (see Ref. 96 and caption of Fig. 12). The curve labeled corresponds to the single-hole solution. For larger dopings the figure is an average over electric field directions parallel and perpendicular to the BC stripes. The inset shows the low-energy spectra excluding the Drude component. We used a Lorentzian broadening of .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Sketch of transition charges (black arrows) and transition currents (gray arrows) for a BC stripe (indicated by the dashed lines) when the collective MIR mode is excited. The transition charges provide a snapshot of the charge oscillation in the collective mode. The black arrows indicate charge increase (up) or decrease (down). The horizontal arrows indicate the associated current fluctuation. Cu and O sites are symbolized by unfilled and filled circles, respectively.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Mean-field energy per stripe cell (8 Cu’s) as a function of the collective phase of the CDW for various doping levels and for stripes in a system.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Experimental67 and theoretical integrated optical conductivity spectral weight integrated up to vs. . The spectral weight is converted to an effective number of electrons as in Ref. 67. The background dielectric constant is our only free parameter and was adjusted to achieve overall agreement of the theoretical and experimental intensities. We also show the computed Drude and regular contributions in each direction. The dashed lines indicate the region of metastability of the solution. The points not joined by lines correspond to the solution, which becomes more stable in that region.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

[ Eq. (28)] vs. filling fraction for BC stripes for different values of the next-nearest neighbor hopping . Symbols: calculated energy on a lattice; solid lines: fits as described in the text.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Energy and wave vector dependence of magnetic excitations in the half-filled system as obtained from the approach for and . Squares and triangles correspond to data points from INS experiments on by Coldea et al. 118

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Dispersion of magnetic excitations along (left) and perpendicular (right) to an array of BC stripes. We also show the experimental data from Ref. 70.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

integrated on the AF magnetic Brillouin zone140 for BC and SC stripes together with the experimental data.70 We have fixed the polarization and intensity renormalization factor as . For details see Ref. 139. For the meaning of the “error” bars see Ref. 70.

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

Constant energy scans of for BC stripes oriented along the direction. The size of the panels represent the full Brillouin zone. The title indicates the energy of the scan. The intensities are averaged in an energy window for energies and for higher frequencies.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

Constant-frequency scans of for BC stripes convolved with a Gaussian . The title indicates the energy or the energy window over which intensities are averaged. In order to compare with the experimental data of Ref. 70 the panels show the average of both horizontal and vertical stripes with the coordinate system rotated by 45° with wave-vector units of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199431
2006-04-01
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Dynamic properties of inhomogeneous states in cuprates (Review Article)
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199431
10.1063/1.2199431
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM