1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Nonadiabatic breakdown and pairing in high- compounds
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2199434
/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199434
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199434
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Re-elaboration of vs. plot after Refs. 23 and 24, including magnesium diboride alloys.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Diagrammatic expression of the electron-phonon self-energy. The solid line represents the electron Green’s function, the wavy line the phonon propagator, and the filled circles the electron-phonon vertex function.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Self-energy (a) and superconducting pairing (b) of an electron-phonon system in conventional Migdal–Eliashberg framework.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Feynman’s representation of the first-order diagram appearing in the nonadiabatic regime.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Sign of the vertex function in the space for a nonadiabatic system .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Momentum-frequency average of the vertex diagram as function of the adiabatic parameter for different values of the momentum cutoff (from the top to the bottom): , 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and for .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Nonadiabatic electron-phonon self-energy including the first order vertex diagram arising from the breakdown of Migdal’s theorem.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Renormalization function for and . Solid lines: nonadiabatic theory with . Dashed line: noncrossing approximation with no vertex diagram.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Isotope coefficient on the effective electronic mass calculated for . Solid lines: nonadiabatic theory for . Dashed line: noncrossing approximation with no vertex diagrams.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Self-consistent equation for the superconducting order parameter in the nonadiabatic theory.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Superconducting critical temperature in the nonadiabatic theory as function of the ratio for and different values of (from the top to the bottom line): , 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Isotope coefficient for in the nonadiabatic theory as function of the adiabatic ratio. Same values of and as in previous figure. Smaller values of correspond to lines with steeper initial slope.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Frequency structure of the vertex function for different values of the exchanged momentum: (from top line to the bottom) . The adiabatic parameter is here set to . Left panel refers to the normal state , right panel to the superconducting state . Filled circles mark the static and dynamic limits in the normal and superconducting state.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Critical temperature as a function of the impurity scattering rate for different values of in the nonadiabatic theory. The dashed line corresponds to the noncrossing approximation with no vertex contribution.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Diagrammatic representation of the spin vertex function in nonadiabatic regime. Wavy lines represents the electron-phonon interaction, dashed lines the electron-electron Coulomb repulsion.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Spin susceptibility as function of the adiabatic parameter and of the electron-phonon coupling . The total Pauli spin susceptibility is normalized with respect to the purely electronic one with a Stoner factor . Dashed lines represent the spin susceptibility in the noncrossing approximation, solid lines are the nonadiabatic theory with vertex diagram (from lower to upper line: , 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9).

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

Isotope effect on the spin susceptibility as a function of and as a function of . Solid lines and dashed lines as in the previous figure.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

Panel : Real and imaginary part of for a Einstein phonon mode with and in the presence of impurity scattering. Solid lines corresponds to (upper panel: from bottom to top; lower panel: from top to bottom): , where is the impurity scattering rate. Energy quantities are expressed in units of . The dashed line in the upper panel is the real part of the self-energy in the adiabatic infinite bandwidth limit . Panel : Renormalized electron dispersion corresponding (from left to right) to panel . The dashed line represents the adiabatic limit.

Image of FIG. 19.
FIG. 19.

Schematic picture of uncorrelated (a) and correlated (b) electrons. Correlated systems are characterized by the correlation hole (depicted in panel ) which surrounds each electron and prevent charge fluctuations with wavelength less than .

Image of FIG. 20.
FIG. 20.

Phase diagram of conventional superconductors compared with the fullerene compounds in the space defined by the electron-phonon coupling and the adiabatic parameter . Data for the family were taken from DFT, tight-binding, and ab initio calculations89,90,98 by using standard values for the density of states states/(eV-spin-) and for the Fermi energy .

Image of FIG. 21.
FIG. 21.

Phonon frequency (lower panel) and Coulomb pseudopotential (upper panel) as functions of the electron-phonon coupling . Both the ME (filled squares) and the nonadiabatic (open triangles) equations have been solved in order to reproduce and .

Image of FIG. 22.
FIG. 22.

Schematic phase diagram of the copper oxides compounds in the space of temperature vs. doping.

Image of FIG. 23.
FIG. 23.

Graphical sketch of the different contributions to the effective superconducting coupling. Top panel: The coupling function is mainly determined by the coherent spectral weight, and it exhibits a monotonous growing behavior as a function of doping. The vertex factor tends to enhance the effective coupling at low doping and to depress it at high doping. Middle panel: The total effective electron-phonon coupling has a maximum at some finite value of ; when the effective Morel–Anderson pseudopotential is subtracted, superconductivity is suppressed at high doping. Lower panel: Resulting phase diagram for superconductivity: superconductivity is only possible in a finite region of phase space (gray region), where is positive.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199434
2006-04-01
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Nonadiabatic breakdown and pairing in high-Tc compounds
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/32/4/10.1063/1.2199434
10.1063/1.2199434
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM