1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Photon generation in ferromagnetic point contacts
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4770510
/content/aip/journal/ltp/38/12/10.1063/1.4770510
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/38/12/10.1063/1.4770510
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Diffusive point contact under irradiation. A voltage bias V injects a spin-polarized current from ferromagnetic metal 1 with magnetic moment M 1 into ferromagnetic metal 2 with magnetic moment M 2. A spin-up electron is shown to move along a diffusive trajectory from metal 1 to metal 2 (red line a) where it resonantly interacts with the electromagnetic field, which results in a spin-flip and the emission of a photon. Continuing along its diffusive path with spin down (blue line b), the spin-dependent contact resistance implies that the radiation-induced spin-flip contributes to a change of the magnetoresistance of the point contact.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Zero-temperature energy distributions for (a) magnetic moment-up (spin-down), f p , and (b) magnetic moment-down (spin-up) electrons, f p , at point r in ferromagnetic metal 2 of the point contact. The inset (c) shows the Zeeman energy splitting and the magnetization direction M 2. All states are occupied up to ε = ε f  − eV/2 − I and ε = ε f  − eV/2 + I, respectively (blue rectangles, 1), but in the intervals (ε, ε + eV) and (ε, ε + eV) the states are only partly occupied (red rectangles, 2) and to an extent that is determined by the probabilities α p (r) and α p (r) for “hot” electrons in the ferromagnetic metal to reach r. Clearly, the difference between the densities of spin-down and spin-up electrons, n (r) − n (r) ∝ [(α (2) − α (2))eV − 2I], depends on the bias voltage V. It follows that the spin population can be inverted, so that n (r) > n (r), for large enough V if α (2) > α (2).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Dependence of the relative resistance change under irradiation on the irradiation frequency ω normalized by the electron spin-flip relaxation frequency νsf for νsf /I = 10−1 (here I is the exchange energy).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/ltp/38/12/10.1063/1.4770510
2012-12-27
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Photon generation in ferromagnetic point contacts
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/ltp/38/12/10.1063/1.4770510
10.1063/1.4770510
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM