No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Interaction of an Ionizing Shock Wave with a Transverse Magnetic Field
1.A. G. Kulikovski and G. A. Lyubimov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 129, 52 (1959)
1.[A. G. Kulikovski and G. A. Lyubimov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 4, 1189 (1960)].
2.A. G. Kulikovski and G. A. Lyubimov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 129, 525 (1959)
2.[A. G. Kulikovski and G. A. Lyubimov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 4, 1195 (1960)].
3.C. K. Chu, Phys. Fluids 7, 1349 (1964).
4.R. A. Gross, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 724 (1965).
5.A. Jeffrey and T. Taniuti, Non‐Linear Wave Propagation (Academic, New York, 1964), p. 276.
6.R. T. Taussig (private communication).
7.The analogous model was considered; for example, by E. I. Jantovski, Magnit. Gidrodynamica 4, 53 (1965)
7.[E. I. Jantovski, Magnetohydrodynamics 1, 34 (1965)];
7.by A. I. Bertinov and D. A. Bout, Magnetohydrodynamics 1, 48 (1968)., Magnetohydrodynamics (N.Y.)
8.J. B. Barach, Phys. Fluids 4, 1474 (1961);
8.W. R. Atkinson, W. R. Holden, and R. G. Fowler, J. Appl. Phys. 30, 801 (1959);
8.V. Boublil and K. B. Earnshaw, Phys. Fluids 7, 876 (1964).
9.One‐dimensional analysis of problems with high is valid only in special cases. See, for example, G. W. Sutton and A. Sherman, Engineering Magnetohydrodynamics (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1965), p. 408.
10.Experimental observations of the interaction between the shock and a stationary magnetic field are described by D. A. Bout, R. S. Post, and H. Presby, Phys. Fluids 13, 1399 (1970).
11.Parenthesis denote an algebraic difference on both sides of the shock in its coordinate frame. The index “abs” refers to absolute velocities in the laboratory frame.
12.G. A. Lyubimov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 126, 291 (1959)
12.[G. A. Lyubimov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 4, 510 (1959)].
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...