No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Anomalous High‐Frequency Resistivity of a Plasma
1.P. K. Kaw and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Fluids 12, 2586 (1969).
2.W. L. Kruer, P. K. Kaw, J. M. Dawson, and C. Oberman, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 987 (1970);
2.W. L. Kruer and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1174 (1970);
2.For anomalous heating by a large transverse field at see W. L. Kruer and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Fluids 14, 1003 (1971).
3.Simulations of the anomalous heating by very large pump fields have been carried out by J. DeGroot and J. Katz at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (Livermore, Calif.).
4.I. R. Gekker and O. V. Sizukhin, ZhETF Pis. Red. 9, 408 (1969);
4.[I. R. Gekker and O. V. Sizukhin, JETP Letters 9, 243 (1969).
5.P. K. Kaw, E. Valeo, and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 430 (1970).
6.H. P. Eubank, Phys. Fluids 14, 2551 (1971).
7.H. Hendel and T. K. Chu (private communication).
8.H. Dreicer, D. Henderson, and J. Ingraham, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 1616 (1971).
9.J. W. Shearer (private communication).
10.R. Cohen and J. D. Whitehead, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6439 (1970);
10.F. W. Perkins and P. K. Kaw, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 282 (1971).
11.A. Wong (private communication).
12.J. M. Dawson, C. G. Hsi, and R. Shanny, in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1969) Vol. I, p. 735;
12.W. L. Kruer and J. M. Dawson, presented at the Third Conference on Numerical Simulation of Plasmas, Stanford, Calif. (1969).
13.B. Rosen, W. Kruer, and J. M. Dawson, presented at the Fourth Conference on Numerical Simulation of Plasmas, Washington, D.C., 1970.
14.C. K. Birdsall and D. Fuss, J. Comput. Phys. 3, 494 (1969);
14.R. Morse and C. Nielsen, Phys. Fluids 12, 2418 (1969);
14.J. P. Boris and K. V. Roberts, J. Comput. Phys. 4, 552 (1969).
15.J. Byers and M. Grewal, Phys. Fluids 13, 1819 (1970);
15.J. Denavit and W. L. Kruer, Phys. Fluids 14, 1782 (1971).
16.C. K. Birdsall and J. M. Dawson, in Computers and Their Role in Physical Science, edited by S. Fernbach and A. Taub (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970), p. 247.
17.V. P. Silin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 1679 (1965);
17.[V. P. Silin, Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 1127 (1965)];
17.D. F. DuBois and M. V. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 544 (1965).
18.K. Nishikawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 24, 916, 1152 (1968);
18.J. R. Sanmartin, Phys. Fluids 13, 1533 (1970).
19.S. Takamura, S. Aihara, and K. Takayama, Phys. Fluids 13, 3052 (1970).
20.J. M. Dawson and C. Oberman, Phys. Fluids 5, 517 (1962);
20.J. M. Dawson and C. Oberman, 6, 394 (1963)., Phys. Fluids
21.E. Valeo, Doctoral thesis, Princeton University, 1971.
22.V. V. Pustovalov and V. P. Silin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 59, 2215 (1970)
22.[V. V. Pustovalov and V. P. Silin, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 1198 (1970)].
23.J. M. Dawson and R. Shanny, Phys. Fluids 11, 1506 (1968).
24.Of course, these predictions are simple estimates and should not be taken as precise. For example, in general, we should say saturation in the weak field regime is observed under where
25.E. S. Weibel, Phys. Rev. Letters 2, 83 (1959).
Data & Media loading...
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...