1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A driven two-dimensional granular gas with Coulomb friction
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2049277
/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/10/10.1063/1.2049277
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/10/10.1063/1.2049277
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic drawing of two-particle contact in the center of mass reference frame. Shown are the relative velocity of the contact points, the impact angle of the contact points, and the angle between the relative translational velocity of the particles and their contact normal.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Tangential restitution as function of the impact angle for different values of the coefficient of friction .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Plots of the probability distribution of from simulations (symbols) and from Eq. (12) with values from the simulations. The arrows indicate the corresponding , while the parameters are (a) , and variable , and (b) , and variable .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Expected mean tangential restitution, , as function of the friction coefficient for models A, B, and C. The parameters used are , (for A, B) and different , 0.40, and 0.15 (model C: solid lines from right to left).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Simulation results (symbols) and theory (lines) for the parameters , , , and , plotted against the maximum tangential restitution . (a) Translational temperature , and (b) rotational temperature , plotted against , and scaled by , the mean field value for smooth particles. (c) Ratio of rotational and translational temperature , plotted against .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Translational temperature scaled by the mean field value for smooth particles , plotted against , for the parameters as in Fig. 5. The tangential restitution coefficients are fixed to (a) , and (b) . Data with normal restitution (solid symbols and thick lines) and (open symbols and thin lines) are compared. Models A and B are shown for only.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

plotted against , for the same parameters as in Fig. 6. The tangential restitution coefficients are again fixed to (a) , and (b) .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Deviation from equipartition, , plotted against the inverse friction coefficient, , for simulations from Fig. 6(b). Note the double-logarithmic scale of this plot.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Ratio of rotational and translational temperature, , plotted against , for some simulations from Fig. 6(b). Note the double-logarithmic scale of this plot.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Relaxation rates , close to steady state for as a function of .

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Evolution of temperatures with rescaled time, with , for simulations with , , , , and (a) , (b) . Note that there are no fit parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/10/10.1063/1.2049277
2005-10-03
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A driven two-dimensional granular gas with Coulomb friction
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/10/10.1063/1.2049277
10.1063/1.2049277
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM