1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Experiments on the late-time development of single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.1852574
/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/3/10.1063/1.1852574
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/3/10.1063/1.1852574

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Drawing of the experimental apparatus.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Sequence of images from Collins and Jacobs showing the RM instability produced by an incident shock wave. Times relative to the shock wave arrival are (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , and (f) .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Sequence of images from Collins and Jacobs showing the RM instability produced by an incident shock wave. Times relative to the shock wave arrival are (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , and (f) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Plot of dimensionless amplitude from Collins and Jacobs.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

PLIF images from 20 experiments with and assembled to form a time sequence. Times relative to the shock wave arrival are (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , (k) , (l) , (m) , (n) , (o) , (p) , (q) , (r) , (s) , and (t) .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

PLIF images from 20 experiments with and assembled to form a time sequence. Times relative to the shock wave arrival are (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , (k) , (l) , (m) , (n) , (o) , (p) , (q) , (r) , (s) , and (t) .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Comparison of the dimensionless amplitude measurements with several nonlinear solutions and models.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Comparison of the models of Sadot et al. and Mikaelian with dimensionless bubble and spike amplitude measurements.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

A plot illustrating the Atwood number sensitivity of the nonlinear models and solutions. The solid lines represent the solutions and models evaluated with the average value of the Atwood number used for the two sets of experiments , while the error bars represent these expressions evaluated at the actual values used ( for the experiments and for the experiments). Note that the Atwood number sensitivity was too small to indicate for the solution of Vandenboomgaerde et al.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Comparison of the model of Sadot et al. evaluated using alternative expressions for the asymptotic bubble and spike velocity.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Parameter values for the two sets of experiments.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Average deviation measurements for the data of Fig. 7.

Generic image for table
Table III.

Average deviation measurements for the data of Fig. 8.

Generic image for table
Table IV.

Average deviation measurements for the data of Fig. 10.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/3/10.1063/1.1852574
2005-02-10
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Experiments on the late-time development of single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/17/3/10.1063/1.1852574
10.1063/1.1852574
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM