banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Stability of a dragged viscous thread: Onset of “stitching” in a fluid-mechanical “sewing machine”
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Geometry of a dragged viscous thread. Fluid with kinematic viscosity , density , and surface tension coefficient is ejected downward at a constant volumetric rate through a hole of diameter ; the fluid thread falls a distance onto a horizontal belt moving with uniform speed . Liquid rope coiling on a stationary surface corresponds to . The origin of the Cartesian coordinates is at the center of the hole (the axes are displaced to the right for clarity).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Selected “stitch” patterns produced by a fluid-mechanical “sewing machine” (Fig. 1) with and different values of the volume flux , the viscosity , the fall height , and the belt speed . In (d), and ; in all other panels, and . (a) Steady dragged thread, , ; (b) meanders, , ; (c) slanted loops, , ; (d) braiding, , ; (e) figures-of-eight, , ; (f) W-pattern, , ; (g) translated coiling, , . The belt moves from left to right, and the smallest division of the scale at the bottom of each image is . The value of the viscosity is approximate due to temperature changes during the experiment.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Shapes of a steady dragged thread as a function of the belt speed , as predicted numerically by solving Eqs. (3) and (4) (black lines) and as observed experimentally (gray images) in experiment 1 with . (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Dragout distance as a function of belt speed for experiment 9 and . Circles: experimental measurements. Solid line: numerical prediction obtained using the full theory presented herein (with both stretching and bending terms). Dashed line: numerical prediction using the pure stretching theory of CWL (Ref. 16).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Critical belt speed as a function of fall height , for experiments (a) 5, (b) 7, and (c) 8. Black circles: experimental measurements. Solid lines: prediction of the linear stability analysis described in the text. Dotted lines (nearly indistinguishable from the solid ones): axial velocity at the bottom of a thread coiling on a stationary surface with the same experimental parameters. Dashed lines: critical belt speed at which the pure stretching solution of CWL (Ref. 16) ceases to exist.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Numerically calculated, neutrally stable shapes of a steady dragged thread for the parameters of experiment 5 and . The solid, long-dashed, and short-dashed lines indicate the position of the thread’s axis, and correspond to critical belt speeds , , and , respectively. The horizontal scale is exaggerated by a factor of 15 relative to the vertical scale.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Angular frequency of oscillation at the critical belt speed as a function of fall height , for experiments (a) 5, (b) 7, and (c) 8. Black circles: experimental measurements. Solid lines: frequency calculated via the linear stability analysis described in the text. Dashed lines: angular frequency of steady coiling on a motionless surface for the same experimental parameters.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Comparison of numerically predicted shapes of viscous threads falling onto moving (a,c) and stationary (b,d) surfaces. The fall height is , and the values of , , , , and are those of experiment 5 in Table I. The vertical and horizontal scales are equal in each view. (a) Critical (marginally stable) steady shape of a thread dragged with velocity . (b) Steady (in the corotating frame) shape of a thread coiling with angular frequency on a stationary surface. Horizontal arrows indicate the points below which the thread is in compression . (c,d) Magnified views of the lower portions of (a) and (b), respectively, viewed parallel to the axial unit vector at the contact point. The size of the grid squares is in (a) and (b) and in (c) and (d). The black dots in (b) and (d) mark the point on the surface directly below the ejection hole.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

(a) Inclination of the thread axis from the horizontal as a function of arclength along the dragged thread shown in Fig. 8(a) (solid) and the coiling thread shown in Fig. 8(b) (dashed). (b) Same as (a), but for the axial velocity scaled by the ejection velocity . (b) Same as (a), but for the total rate of viscous dissipation due to bending plus twisting, scaled by .


Generic image for table
Table I.

Parameters of the laboratory experiments referred to in this paper, numbered as in Table I of CWL (Ref. 16) is the density, is the volume flux, and is the diameter of the hole from which the fluid is ejected. The two values of the kinematic viscosity are for the maximum and minimum temperatures, respectively, during the experiment. The coefficient of surface tension is .


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Stability of a dragged viscous thread: Onset of “stitching” in a fluid-mechanical “sewing machine”