1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effect of viscosity on droplet-droplet collision outcome: Experimental study and numerical comparison
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2781603
/content/aip/journal/pof2/19/10/10.1063/1.2781603
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/19/10/10.1063/1.2781603

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

A typical collision map for droplet-droplet collisions for hydrocarbons.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Problems of using regular disturbances for jet breakup. Due to large deformation of the colliding droplets, they coalesces with neighboring pairs due to small interdroplet spacing . MEG with droplet spacing .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Description of the geometrical parameters involved.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Droplet collision outcome for n-decane .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Droplet collision outcome for monoethyleneglycol (MEG) .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Droplet collision outcome for diethyleneglycol (DEG) .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Droplet collision outcome for triethyleneglycol (TEG) .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Stretching separation boundaries for different fluids. Experimental data and borders predicted by the model of Jiang et al. (Ref. 3).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Onset of reflexive separation for different fluids. Note: the data from MEG and DEG are obtained by amplitude modulation ( and , respectively).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

MEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

MEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

MEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

MEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

MEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

MEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

MEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

DEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

DEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 19.
FIG. 19.

DEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 20.
FIG. 20.

DEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 21.
FIG. 21.

DEG, , stretching separation.

Image of FIG. 22.
FIG. 22.

TEG, , coalescence.

Image of FIG. 23.
FIG. 23.

TEG, , stretching separation.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Range of experimental conditions investigated (single frequency generation).

Generic image for table
Table II.

Range of experimental conditions for amplitude modulated frequencies.

Generic image for table
Table III.

Physical property data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/19/10/10.1063/1.2781603
2007-10-10
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Effect of viscosity on droplet-droplet collision outcome: Experimental study and numerical comparison
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/19/10/10.1063/1.2781603
10.1063/1.2781603
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM