1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Resonant pumping in a multilayer impedance pump
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2856528
/content/aip/journal/pof2/20/2/10.1063/1.2856528
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/20/2/10.1063/1.2856528

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Illustration of the multilayer impedance pumping mechanism.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Top) 3D view of the physical model of the gelatinous impedance pump. (Bottom) 2D view in the longitudinal cross section.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Schematic of the boundary conditions.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

2D axisymmetric view of the mesh and pinching of imposed displacement of a series of nodes at the outer surface of the tube.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Impulse response: (top) Exit flow rate variation in time under triangular impulse excitation; (bottom) the associated power spectrum density (PSD). The Fourier transform was calculated using 4096 points and a time resolution of .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Typical exit flow rate history plot. Excitation frequency is . Periodicity is achieved after 15 pinching cycles and mean flow at steady state is . The solid line is a filtered curve of the flow rate using a moving average window of one cycle.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Mean exit flow rate as a function of the excitation frequency .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Gelatin maximum positive radial strain in time and space vs frequency of excitation .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Illustration of the propagating waves in the multilayer impedance pump. Example for . Selected frames at time as a fraction of the period time . Top frame: Outline of the model, walls position against longitudinal axis. Middle frame: Corresponding snapshots of the axial velocity fluid field. Bottom frame: Axial pressure longitudinal distribution.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

(Top) Cross-sectional view of the impedance pump and the fixed control volume (solid line box) used to compute the energy balance, and the moving wall (dashed line). The fixed control volume is delimited by the input and output cross sections, the axis of symmetry, and a closure line outside the pump. The input and output cross sections delimit the passive portion of the tube for which mechanical work is calculated. We use a fixed control volume that encloses the moving wall so that to consider the wall motion as a shaft work. (Bottom) Schematic of the energy contributions to the fluid for the control volume considered. Pumping work defined as shaft work minus the losses is balanced by the differential of energy between the output and input of the system.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Pumping work of the elastic tube (, ) vs frequency of excitation .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Physical parameters.

Generic image for table
Table II.

The different test cases (mesh and time steps refinements) and the associated error with respect to the finest mesh.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/20/2/10.1063/1.2856528
2008-02-28
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Resonant pumping in a multilayer impedance pump
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/20/2/10.1063/1.2856528
10.1063/1.2856528
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM