1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Thermal radiation from a converging shock implosion
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3392769
/content/aip/journal/pof2/22/4/10.1063/1.3392769
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/22/4/10.1063/1.3392769
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Hot luminescent gas core at the middle of the convergence chamber.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Schematic drawing of the shock tube: (A) driver section, (B) inlet pipe, (C) transformation section, (D) annular tube, and (E) test section. and , shock sensors; and , glass windows framing the test section.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Test section: (a) drawing of the wing profiles where the outer ring represents the annular channel; (b) photograph of the test section with the profiles installed in the chamber.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Arrangement of the schlieren optics: (L) lens, (M) mirror, and (S) the schlieren stop. and are the temperature sensors used for triggering and measuring the shock speed in the annular tube.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Spectrometric setup. The spectrometer is triggered by the shock wave passing and deflecting the HeNe laser beam detected by a photodiode. The time between the signal and capture is determined with a delay unit.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Schlieren images of converging cylindrical shock waves in air at 13.3 kPa. The Mach number of the initial annular shock was . The time between image capture and focusing instant is displayed under each image. Images (a)–(e) show the converging shocks before focusing while (f) shows the reflected diverging shock. The distance between opposite wing tips is 40 mm.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Idealized diagram over the shock interactions responsible for forming the polygonal shape. Detail from Fig. 6(c) is inserted.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Two examples of the multiply exposed schlieren photographs used for determining shock position and velocity: (a) in air and (b) in argon. The light spot seen in the middle of (b) is the luminescent gas core.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Propagation of polygonal shock wave in air and argon (○) compared with circular Guderley solutions (dashed lines). Power law fits (full lines) to the experimental data are added for comparison.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Mach number from fits to experimental data (full lines) and circular cylindrical Guderley solution (dashed lines). The upper curves represent the shock in argon with initial and the lower in air with initial . The experimental fit represents averaged Mach number of the polygonal wave.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Linear fits to the shock front position to determine Mach numbers of incident shock and Mach stems for shock wave in air and in argon (○).

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Deviation of the shock wave shape vs radius.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Photographs of the light emitting gas core: (a) photo showing the full view of the test section; (b) a photo taken from a closer distance.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Photomultiplier records of light emissions from converging polygonal shock waves in argon with helium as driver: mean value and standard deviation (dashed lines) from 20 runs.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Raw time-integrated emission spectrum of the entire light flash. A continuum and two groups of lines from electron transitions in neutral argon atoms were especially notable.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Time-resolved spectra of the light flash. The spectra, taken with exposure times of 60 ns, show the evolution of the continuum and the appearance of the argon emission lines. The spectra have been corrected for CCD sensitivity. Each spectrum is taken at a separate run.

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

Spectra taken during 60 ns at three different times after the implosion instant: (a) photomultiplier signal with marks indicating the time of each spectrum; (b) ; (c) ; (d) . The intensity scales differ between the graphs.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

Filtered spectra with blackbody curve fits. The blackbody curves are corrected for the quantum efficiency of the camera and the glass window transmission losses. The times at start of exposure and blackbody temperature are (a) , ; (b) , .

Image of FIG. 19.
FIG. 19.

Temperatures acquired from blackbody fits of time-resolved spectra with 60 ns exposure time. Each data point represents measurements made on separate runs. The temporal errors are ±20 ns.

Image of FIG. 20.
FIG. 20.

The computational domain (a) and a magnification of a small circular region around the right tip of the left horizontal wing (b).

Image of FIG. 21.
FIG. 21.

Numerical schlieren images of the global shock system in the air-filled chamber at equidistant times. Initial Mach number .

Image of FIG. 22.
FIG. 22.

Numerical schlieren images of the central part of the air-filled chamber showing the converging shock fronts at the time instants corresponding to the experimental schlieren photographs shown in Fig. 6. Initial Mach number .

Image of FIG. 23.
FIG. 23.

Comparison of a detail of a schlieren photograph, Fig. 6(d), computational mesh, and numerical schlieren image computed at the same instant prior to implosion.

Image of FIG. 24.
FIG. 24.

Effective radius of converging and diverging polygonal shock fronts. Experimental and numerical data for the shock in air with air as driver gas (, full line) and argon with helium as driver gas (○, dashed line).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/22/4/10.1063/1.3392769
2010-04-30
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Thermal radiation from a converging shock implosion
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/22/4/10.1063/1.3392769
10.1063/1.3392769
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM