No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Numerical simulations of spatially developing, accelerating boundary layers
1. R. Narasimha and K. R. Sreenivasan, “Relaminarization of fluid flows,” in Advances in Applied Mechanics (Academic Press Professional Inc., New York, 1979), Vol. 19, pp. 221–309.
3. H. Schlichting, Boundary-Layer Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979).
13. R. B. Cal and L. Castillo, “Similarity analysis of favorable pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers with eventual quasilaminarization,” Phys. Fluids 20, 105106–1105106–18 (2008).
17. D. M. McEligot, R. S. Brodkey, and H. Eckelmann, “Laterally converging duct flows. Part 4. Temporal behaviour in the viscous layer,” J. Fluid Mech. 634, 433–461 (2009).
18. H. H. Fernholz and D. Warnack, “The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. The turbulent boundary layer,” J. Fluid Mech. 359, 329–356 (1998).
19. D. Warnack and H. H. Fernholz, “The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. The boundary layer with relaminarization,” J. Fluid Mech. 359, 357–371 (1998).
20. M. P. Escudier, A. Abdel-Hameed, M. W. Johnson, and C. J. Sutcliffe, “Laminarisation and re-transition of a turbulent boundary layer subjected to favourable pressure gradient,” Exp. Fluids 25, 491–502 (1998).
23. G. De Prisco, A. Keating, and U. Piomelli, “Large-eddy simulation of accelerating boundary layers,” AIAA Paper 2007-0725, 2007.
24. Z. Harun, J. P. Monty, R. Mathis, and I. Marusic, “Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers,” J. Fluid Mech. 715, 477–498 (2013).
25. M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot, “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model,” Phys. Fluids A 3, 1760–1765 (1991).
30. Y. Morinishi, T. S. Lund, O. V. Vasilyev, and P. Moin, “Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flows,” J. Comput. Phys. 143, 90–124 (1998).
31. A. Keating, U. Piomelli, E. Balaras, and H.-J. Kaltenbach, “A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation,” Phys. Fluids 16, 4696–4712 (2004).
34. T. S. Lund, X. Wu, and K. D. Squires, “Generation of inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations,” J. Comput. Phys. 140, 233–258 (1998).
36. H. M. Nagib and K. A. Chauhan, “Variations of von kármán coefficient in canonical flows,” Phys. Fluids 20, 101518–1101518–10 (2008).
39. W. Schoppa and F. Hussain, “Generation of near-wall coherent structures in a turbulent boundary layer,” Curr. Sci. 79, 849–858 (2000).
41. A. Scotti, “Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flows with boundary roughened with virtual sandpaper,” Phys. Fluids 18, 031701 (2006).
42. J. Yuan, “Large-eddy simulations of accelerating boundary-layer flows over rough surfaces,” Master's thesis (Queen's University, 2011).
43. P. Orlandi, S. Leonardi, R. Tuzi, and R. A. Antonia, “Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow with wall velocity disturbances,” Phys. Fluids 15, 3587 (2003).
44. J. Zhou, R. J. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T. M. Kendall, “Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396 (1999).
46. P. S. Bernard and J. M. Wallace, Turbulent Flow: Analysis, Measurement, and Prediction (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2002).
Article metrics loading...
We present the results of direct and large-eddy simulations of spatially developing boundary layers subjected to favorable pressure gradient, strong enough to cause reversion of the flow towards a quasi-laminar state. The numerical results compare well with experimental data. Visualization of the flow structures shows the well-known stabilization of the streaks, the re-orientation of outer layer vortices in the streamwise direction, and the appearance of turbulent spots in the re-transition region. Both instantaneous visualizations and turbulent statistics highlight the significant damping of wall-normal and spanwise fluctuations. The fast component of the pressure fluctuations appears to be the main driver of this process, contributing to reduce pressure fluctuations and, as a consequence, the energy redistribution term in the Reynolds stress budgets. The streamwise stresses, in whose budget a separate production term plays a role, do not decay but remain frozen at their upstream value. The decrease of wall-normal and spanwise fluctuations appears to be the main cause of the inner-layer stabilization, by disrupting the generation and subsequent growth of streaks, consistent with various models of the turbulence-generation cycle proposed in the literature. The outer layer seems to play a passive role in this process. The stretching and reorientation of the outer-layer vortices results in a more orderly and organized structure; since fewer ejections occur, the inner layer does not break this re-organization, which is maintained until re-transition begins.
Full text loading...
Most read this month