1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Control and optimization of solute transport in a thin porous tube
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545
1.
1. H. W. Hou, A. A. S. Bhagat, W. C. Lee, S. Huang, J. Han, and C. T. Lim, “Microfluidic devices for blood fractionation,” Micromachines 2(3), 319343 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi2030319
2.
2. R. S. Juang, H. L. Chen, and Y. S. Chen, “Resistance-in-series analysis in cross-flow ultrafiltration of fermentation broths of Bacillus subtilis culture,” J. Membr. Sci. 323(1), 193200 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.032
3.
3. S. Metsamuuronen, J. Howell, and M. Nystrom, “Critical flux in ultrafiltration of myoglobin and baker's yeast,” J. Membr. Sci. 196(1), 1325 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00572-5
4.
4. R. J. Shipley, S. L. Waters, and M. J. Ellis, “Definition and validation of operating equations for poly(vinyl alcohol)-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microfiltration membrane scaffold bioreactors,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107, 382392 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.22815
5.
5. T. Vicente, C. Peixoto, M. J. T. Carrondo, and P. M. Alves, “Purification of recombinant baculoviruses for gene therapy using membrane processes,” Gene Ther. 16(6), 766775 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gt.2009.33
6.
6. J. C. Giddings, “Field-flow fractionation,” Sep. Sci. Technol. 19(11–12), 831847 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496398408068596
7.
7. A. Litzen and K. G. Wahlund, “Improved separation speed and efficiency for proteins, nucleic acids and viruses in asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation,” J. Chromatogr. A 476, 413421 (1989).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)93885-3
8.
8. M. H. Moon, I. Park, and Y. Kim, “Size characterization of liposomes by flow field-flow fractionation and photon correlation spectroscopy: Effect of ionic strength and pH of carrier solutions,” J. Chromatogr. A 813(1), 91100 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00325-2
9.
9. W. J. Lee, B. R. Min, and M. H. Moon, “Improvement in particle separation by hollow fiber flow field-flow fractionation and the potential use in obtaining particle size distribution,” Anal. Chem. 71(16), 34463452 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac981204p
10.
10. S. R. Raine, W. S. Meyer, D. W. Rassam, J. L. Hutson, and F. J. Cook, “Soil–water and solute movement under precision irrigation: knowledge gaps for managing sustainable root zones,” Irrig. Sci. 26(1), 91100 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0075-y
11.
11. J. M. MacDonald, S. P. Wolfe, R. I. Chowdhury, H. Kubota, and L. M. Reid, “Effect of flow configuration and membrane characteristics on membrane fouling in a novel multicoaxial hollow-fiber bioartificial liver,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 944(1), 334343 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03845.x
12.
12. N. S. Hanspal, A. N. Waghode, V. Nassehi, and R. J. Wakeman, “Development of a predictive mathematical model for coupled Stokes/Darcy flows in cross-flow membrane filtration,” Chem. Eng. J. 149(1–3), 132142 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.012
13.
13. L. Huang and M. T. Morrissey, “Finite element analysis as a tool for crossflow membrane filter simulation,” J. Membr. Sci. 155(1), 1930 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00300-7
14.
14. R. P. Ma, C. H. Gooding, and W. K. Alexander, “A dynamic model for low-pressure, hollow-fiber ultrafiltration,” AIChE J. 31(10), 17281732 (1985).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690311018
15.
15. S. W. Yuan and A. B. Finkelstein, “Laminar pipe flow with injection and suction through a porous wall,” Trans. ASME 78, 719 (1956).
16.
16. M. R. Doshi, W. N. Gill, and R. Shankar Subramanian, “Unsteady reverse osmosis or ultrafiltration in a tube,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 30(12), 14671476 (1975).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(75)85024-X
17.
17. G. S. Beavers and D. D. Joseph, “Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall,” J. Fluid Mech. 30(1), 197207 (1967).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112067001375
18.
18. A. S. Berman, “Laminar flow in channels with porous walls,” J. Appl. Phys. 24, 12321235 (1953).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1721476
19.
19. R. J. Shipley and S. L. Waters, “Fluid and mass transport modelling to drive the design of cell-packed hollow fibre bioreactors for tissue engineering applications,” Math. Med. Biol. 29, 329359 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqr025
20.
20. R. Langer and J. P. Vacanti, “Tissue engineering,” Science 260(5110), 920926 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8493529
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545
Loading
/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545
2013-03-26
2014-10-21

Abstract

Predicting the distribution of solutes or particles in flows within porous-walled tubes is essential to inform the design of devices that rely on cross-flow filtration, such as those used in water purification, irrigation devices, field-flow fractionation, and hollow-fibre bioreactors for tissue-engineering applications. Motivated by these applications, a radially averaged model for fluid and solute transport in a tube with thin porous walls is derived by developing the classical ideas of Taylor dispersion. The model includes solute diffusion and advection via both radial and axial flow components, and the advection, diffusion, and uptake coefficients in the averaged equation are explicitly derived. The effect of wall permeability, slip, and pressure differentials upon the dispersive solute behaviour are investigated. The model is used to explore the control of solute transport across the membrane walls via the membrane permeability, and a parametric expression for the permeability required to generate a given solute distribution is derived. The theory is applied to the specific example of a hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor, where a uniform delivery of nutrient across the membrane walls to the extra-capillary space is required to promote spatially uniform cell growth.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/1.4795545.html;jsessionid=2j4ncirg6psf6.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pof2
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Control and optimization of solute transport in a thin porous tube
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pof2/25/3/10.1063/1.4795545
10.1063/1.4795545
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM