Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. F. P. Bretherton, “Momentum transport by gravity waves,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 213243 (1969).
2. C. McLandress, “On the importance of gravity waves in the middle atmosphere and their parameterization in general circulation models,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 60, 13571383 (1998).
3. T. N. Palmer, G. J. Shutts, and R. Swinbank, “Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity drag parametrization,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 112, 10011039 (1986).
4. N. A. McFarlane, “The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere,” J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 17751800 (1987).<1775:TEOOEG>2.0.CO;2
5. K. Hamilton, “Comprehensive meteorological modelling of the middle atmosphere: A tutorial review,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 58, 15911627 (1996).
6. R. S. Lindzen, “Turbulence and stress owing to gravity wave and tidal breakdown,” J. Geophys. Res. 86, 97079714, doi:10.1029/JC086iC10p09707 (1981).
7. G. D. Nastrom and D. C. Fritts, “Sources of mesoscale variability of gravity waves. Part I: Topographic excitation,” J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 101110 (1992).<0101:SOMVOG>2.0.CO;2
8. A. S. Medvedev and G. P. Klaassen, “Vertical evolution of gravity wave spectra and the parameterization of associated wave drag,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 2584125853, doi:10.1029/95JD02533 (1995).
9. C. O. Hines, “Doppler-spread parameterization of gravity-wave momentum deposition in the middle atmosphere. Part 1: Basic formulation,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 59, 371386 (1997).
10. C. Staquet and J. Sommeria, “Internal gravity waves: From instabilities to turbulence,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 559593 (2002).
11. T. J. Dunkerton, “Wave transience in a compressible atmosphere. Part I: Transient internal wave, mean-flow interaction,” J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 281297 (1981).<0281:WTIACA>2.0.CO;2
12. B. R. Sutherland, “Weakly nonlinear internal wavepackets,” J. Fluid Mech. 569, 249258 (2006).
13. D. C. Fritts and T. J. Dunkerton, “A quasi-linear study of gravity-wave saturation and self-acceleration,” J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 32723289 (1984).<3272:AQLSOG>2.0.CO;2
14. B. R. Sutherland, “Finite-amplitude internal wavepacket dispersion and breaking,” J. Fluid Mech. 429, 343380 (2001).
15. H. V. Dosser and B. R. Sutherland, “Weakly nonlinear non-Boussinesq internal gravity wavepackets,” Physica D 240, 346356 (2011).
16. H. V. Dosser and B. R. Sutherland, “Anelastic internal wavepacket evolution and stability,” J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 28442859 (2011).
17. B. R. Sutherland, “Internal wave reflection in uniform shear,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126, 32553287 (2000).
18. B. R. Sutherland and P. F. Linden, “An experimental/numerical study of internal wave transmission across an evanescent level,” in Mixing and Dispersion in Stably Stratified Flows, edited by P. A. Davies (Oxford University Press, IMA, 1999), pp. 251262.
19. B. R. Sutherland, Internal Gravity Waves (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010), p. 378.
20. M. E. McIntyre, “On the wave momentum myth,” J. Fluid Mech. 106, 331347 (1981).
21. J. F. Scinocca and T. G. Shepherd, “Nonlinear wave-activity conservation laws and Hamiltonian structure for the two-dimensional anelastic equations,” J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 527 (1992).<0005:NWACLA>2.0.CO;2
22. G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 1974), p. 636.
23. B. R. Sutherland and W. R. Peltier, “Turbulence transition and internal wave generation in density stratified jets,” Phys. Fluids 6, 12671284 (1994).
24. E. Fleming, S. Chandra, M. Shoeberl, and J. Barnett, “Monthly mean global climatology of temperature, wind, geopotential height, and pressure for 0–120 km,” Technical Report No. 100697, NASA, 1988.
25. T. Lund and D. C. Fritts, “Numerical simulation of gravity wave breaking in the lower thermosphere,” J. Geophys. Res. 117, D21105, doi:10.1029/2012JD017536 (2012).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



We perform fully nonlinear simulations in two dimensions of a horizontally periodic, vertically localized, anelastic internal wavepacket in order to examine the effects of weak and strong nonlinearity upon wavepackets approaching a reflection level in uniform retrograde shear. Transmission, reflection, and momentum deposition are measured in terms of the horizontal momentum associated with the wave-induced mean flow. These are determined in part as they depend upon the initial wavenumber vector, , which determines the modulational stability (if |/| ≳ 0.7) or instability (if |/| ≲ 0.7) of moderately large amplitude quasi-monochromatic internal wavepackets. Whether modulationally stable or unstable, the evolution of the wavepacket is determined by the height of the reflection level predicted by linear theory, , relative to the height, , at which weak nonlinearity becomes significant, and the height, , at which linear theory predicts anelastic waves first overturn in the absence of shear. If , the amplitude remains sufficiently small and the waves reflect as predicted by linear theory. If is moderately larger than , a fraction of the momentum associated with the wavepackets transmits past the reflection level. This is because the positive shear associated with the wave-induced mean flow can partially shield the wavepacket from the influence of the negative background shear enhancing its transmission. The effect is enhanced for weakly nonlinear modulational unstable wavepackets that narrow and grow in amplitude faster than the anelastic growth rate. However, as nonlinear effects become more pronounced, a significant fraction of the momentum associated with the wavepacket is irreversibly deposited to the background below the reflection level. This is particularly the case for modulationally unstable wavepackets, whose enhanced amplitude growth leads to overturning below the predicted breaking level. Because the growth in the amplitude envelope of modulationally stable wavepackets is retarded by weakly nonlinear effects, reflection is enhanced and transmission retarded relative to their modulationally unstable counterparts. Applications to mountain wave propagation through the stratosphere in the winter hemisphere are discussed.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd