Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. S. Chen and G. D. Doolen, “Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 329 (1998).
2. Y. H. Qian, S. Succi, and S. A. Orszag, “Recent advances in lattice Boltzmann computing,” Annu. Rev. Comput. Phys. 30, 195 (1995).
3. S. Succi, The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
4. D. d'Humières, “Generalized lattice-Boltzmann equations” in Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Theory and Simulations, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, edited by B. D. Shizgal and D. P. Weaver (AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1992), Vol. 159, p. 450.
5. D. d'Humières, I. Ginzburg, M. Krafczyk, P. Lallemand, and L.-S. Luo, “Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann models in three dimensions,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, A 360, 437 (2002).
6. P. Lallemand and L.-S. Luo, “Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and stability,” Phys. Rev. E 61, 6546 (2000).
7. P. Lallemand and L.-S. Luo, “Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Acoustic and thermal properties in two and three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 036706 (2003).
8. M. C. Geier, A. Greiner, and J. G. Korvink, “Cascaded digital lattice Boltzmann automata for high Reynolds number flow,” Phys. Rev. E 73, 066705 (2006).
9. D. Lycett-Brown and K. H. Luo, “Multiphase cascaded lattice Boltzmann method,” Comput. Math. Appl. 67, 350 (2014).
10. X. Shan and H. Chen, “Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components,” Phys. Rev. E 47, 1815 (1993).
11. X. Shan and H. Chen, “Simulation of nonideal gases and liquid-gas phase transitions by the lattice Boltzmann equation,” Phys. Rev. E 49, 2941 (1994).
12. A. L. Kupershtokh, D. A. Medvedev, and D. I. Karpov, “On equations of state in a lattice Boltzmann method,” Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 965 (2009).
13. B. F. Lin, J. H. Huang, and D. Y. Huang, “Experimental study of the effects of vegetable oil methyl ester on DI diesel engine performance characteristics and pollutant emissions,” Fuel 88, 1779 (2009).
14. C. Öner and S. Altun, “Biodiesel production from inedible animal tallow and an experimental investigation of its use as alternative fuel in a direct injection diesel engine,” Appl. Energy 86, 2114 (2009).
15. H. Aydin and H. Bayindir, “Performance and emission analysis of cottonseed oil methyl ester in a diesel engine,” Renewable Energy 35, 588 (2010).
16. Z. Utlua and M. S. Koçak, “The effect of biodiesel fuel obtained from waste frying oil on direct injection diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions,” Renewable Energy 33, 1936 (2008).
17. J. Qian and C. K. Law, “Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision,” J. Fluid Mech. 331, 59 (1997).
18. N. Ashgriz and J. Y. Poo, “Coalescence and separation in binary collisions of liquid drops,” J. Fluid Mech. 221, 183 (1990).
19. C. Rabe, J. Malet, and F. Feuillebois, “Experimental investigation of water droplet binary collisions and description of outcomes with a symmetric Weber number,” Phys. Fluids 22, 047101 (2010).
20. C. Tang, P. Zhang, and C. K. Law, “Bouncing, coalescence, and separation in head-on collision of unequal-size droplets,” Phys. Fluids 24, 022101 (2012).
21. K.-L. Pan, P.-C. Chou, and Y.-J. Tseng, “Binary droplet collision at high Weber number,” Phys. Rev. E 80, 036301 (2009).
22. Y. Pan and K. Suga, “Numerical simulation of binary liquid droplet collision,” Phys. Fluids 17, 082105 (2005).
23. S. Tanguy and A. Berlemont, “Application of a level set method for simulation of droplet collisions,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 31, 1015 (2005).
24. N. Nikolopoulos and G. Bergeles, “The effect of gas and liquid properties and droplet size ratio on the central collision between two unequal-size droplets in the reflexive regime,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 678 (2011).
25. T. Inamuro, S. Tajima, and F. Ogino, “Lattice Boltzmann simulation of droplet collision dynamics,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 4649 (2004).
26. K. H. Luo, J. Xia, and E. Monaco, “Multiscale modeling of multiphase flow with complex interactions,” J. Multiscale Modell. 01, 125 (2009).
27. C. Focke and D. Bothe, “Direct numerical simulation of binary off-centre collisions of shear thinning droplets at high Weber numbers,” Phys. Fluids 24, 073105 (2012).
28. I. V. Karlin and P. Asinari, “Factorization symmetry in the lattice Boltzmann method,” Physica A 389, 1530 (2010).
29. M. C. Geier, A. Greiner, and J. G. Korvink, “Properties of the cascaded lattice Boltzmann automaton,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 455 (2007).
30. E. Orlandini, M. R. Swift, and J. M. Yeomans, “A lattice Boltzmann model of binary-fluid mixtures,” Europhys. Lett. 32, 463 (1995).
31. M. R. Swift, E. Orlandini, W. R. Osborn, and J. M. Yeomans, “Lattice Boltzmann simulations of liquid-gas and binary fluid systems,” Phys. Rev. E 54, 5041 (1996).
32. M. R. Swift, W. R. Osborn, and J. M. Yeomans, “Lattice Boltzmann simulation of nonideal fluids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 830 (1995).
33. X. He and G. D. Doolen, “Thermodynamic foundations of kinetic theory and lattice Boltzmann models for multiphase flows,” J. Stat. Phys. 107, 309 (2002).
34. X. He, X. Shan, and G. D. Doolen, “Discrete Boltzmann equation model for nonideal gases,” Phys. Rev. E 57, R13 (1998).
35. L.-S. Luo, “Unified theory of lattice Boltzmann models for nonideal gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1618 (1998).
36. X. Shan and G. Doolen, “Multicomponent lattice Boltzmann model with interparticle interaction,” J. Stat. Phys. 81, 379 (1995).
37. M. Sbragaglia, R. Benzi, L. Biferale, S. Succi, K. Sugiyama, and F. Toschi, “Generalized lattice Boltzmann method with multirange pseudopotential,” Phys. Rev. E 75, 026702 (2007).
38. P. Yuan and L. Schaefer, “Equations of state in a lattice Boltzmann model,” Phys. Fluids 18, 042101 (2006).
39. Z. Guo, C. Zheng, and B. Shi, “Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method,” Phys. Rev. E 65, 046308 (2002).
40. Q. Li, K. H. Luo, and X. J. Li, “Forcing scheme in pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model for multiphase flows,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 016709 (2012).
41. A. J. Wagner, “Thermodynamic consistency of liquid-gas lattice Boltzmann simulations,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 056703 (2006).
42. K. N. Premnath and S. Banerjee, “Incorporating forcing terms in cascaded lattice Boltzmann approach by method of central moments,” Phys. Rev. E 80, 036702 (2009).
43. A. Gopinath and D. L. Koch, “Collision and rebound of small droplets in an incompressible continuum gas,” J. Fluid Mech. 454, 145 (2002).
44. P. Zhang and C. K. Law, “An analysis of head-on droplet collision with large deformation in gaseous medium,” Phys. Fluids 23, 042102 (2011).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Three-dimensional binary droplet collisions are studied using a multiphase cascaded lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). With this model it is possible to simulate collisions with a Weber number of up to 100 and a Reynolds number of up to 1000, at a liquid to gas density ratio of over 100. This is made possible by improvements to the collision operator of the LBM. The cascaded LBM in three dimensions is introduced, in which additional relaxation rates for higher order moments, defined in a co-moving reference frame, are incorporated into the collision operator. It is shown that these relaxation rates can be tuned to reduce spurious velocities around curved phase boundaries, without compromising the accuracy of the simulation results. The range of attainable Reynolds numbers is therefore increased. Different outcomes from both head-on and off-centre collisions are simulated, for both equal and unequal size droplets, including coalescence, head-on separation, and off-centre separation. For head-on collisions the critical Weber number between coalescence and separation is shown to decrease with decreasing ambient gas pressure. The variation of critical Weber number with droplet size ratio is also studied. Comparisons are made with the theoretical predictions of Tang et al. [“Bouncing, coalescence, and separation in head-on collision of unequal-size droplets,” Phys. Fluids24, 022101 (2012)], and the effect of ambient gas pressure is again considered. For off-centre collisions, boundaries between different collision outcomes are accurately defined and quantitative comparisons are made with the theoretical predictions of Rabe et al. [“Experimental investigation of water droplet binary collisions and description of outcomes with a symmetric Weber number,” Phys. Fluids22, 047101 (2010)]. While general agreement between the simulated and theoretical boundaries is presented, deviations due to varying liquid viscosity are observed. Finally, the prediction of the independence of regime boundaries with varying droplet size ratio, when using the symmetric Weber number as defined by Rabe , is discussed. Simulation results showing qualitative agreement are presented, although some discrepancies are reported.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd