No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
The deviation from parallel shear flow as an indicator of linear eddy-viscosity model inaccuracy
1. M. Emory, J. Larsson, and G. Iaccarino, “Modeling of structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closures,” Phys. Fluids 25, 110822 (2013).
2. C. Gorlé and G. Iaccarino, “A framework for epistemic uncertainty quantification of turbulent scalar flux models for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations,” Phys. Fluids 25, 055105 (2013).
3. P. Bradshaw, “Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow,” Tech. Rep. AGARDograph No. 169 (AGARD, 1973)
7. D. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd ed. (DCW Industries Inc., 2006).
9. R. Rossi, “Passive scalar transport in turbulent flows over a wavy wall,” Ph.D. thesis (Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 2006).
Article metrics loading...
A marker function designed to indicate in which regions of a generic flow field the results from linear eddy-viscosity turbulence models are plausibly inaccurate is introduced. The marker is defined to identify regions that deviate from parallel shear flow. For two different flow fields it is shown that these regions largely coincide with regions where the prediction of the Reynolds stress divergence is inaccurate. The marker therefore offers a guideline for interpreting results obtained from Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations and provides a basis for the further development of turbulence model-form uncertainty quantification methods.
Full text loading...
Most read this month