Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.D. C. Fritts and M. J. Alexander, “Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere,” Rev. Geophys. 41, 1003, doi:10.1029/2001RG000106 (2003).
2.R. Ford, M. E. McIntyre, and W. A. Norton, “Balance and the slow quasimanifold: Some explicit results,” J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 12361254 (2000).<1236:BATSQS>2.0.CO;2
3.J. Vanneste, “Balance and spontanous wave generation in geophysical flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 45, 147172 (2013).
4.R. Plougonven and F. Zhang, “Internal gravity waves from atmospheric jets and fronts,” Rev. Geophys. 52, 3376, doi:10.1002/2012RG000419 (2014).
5.R. Ford, “Gravity wave radiation from vortex trains in rotating shallow water,” J. Fluid Mech. 281, 81118 (1994).
6.M. E. McIntyre, “Spontaneous imbalance and hybrid vortex-gravity structures,” J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 13151325 (2009).
7.N. Sugimoto, K. Ishioka, and S. Yoden, “Gravity wave radiation from unsteady rotational flow in an f-plane shallow water system,” Fluid Dyn. Res. 39, 731754 (2007).
8.N. Sugimoto, K. Ishioka, and K. Ishii, “Parameter sweep experiments on spontaneous gravity wave radiation from unsteady rotational flow in an f-plane shallow water system,” J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 235249 (2008).
9.N. Sugimoto and K. Ishii, “Spontaneous gravity wave radiation in a shallow water system on a rotating sphere,” J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 90, 101125 (2012).
10.N. Sugimoto, K. Ishioka, H. Kobayashi, and Y. Shimomura, “Cyclone-anticyclone asymmetry in gravity wave radiation from a co-rotating vortex pair in rotating shallow water,” J. Fluid Mech. 772, 80106 (2015).
11.M. V. Melander, N. J. Zabusky, and J. C. McWilliams, “Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: Causes and conditions,” J. Fluid Mech. 195, 303340 (1988).
12.D. G. Dritshel, “A general theory for two-dimensional vortex interactions,” J. Fluid Mech. 293, 269303 (1995).
13.P. Meunier, U. Ehrenstein, T. Leweke, and M. Rossi, “A merging criterion for two-dimensional co-rotating vortices,” Phys. Fluids 14, 27572766 (2002).
14.B. E. Mitchell, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, “Direct computation of the sound from a compressible co-rotating vortex pair,” J. Fluid Mech. 285, 181202 (1995).
15.K. Ishioka, in IUTAM Symposium on Computational Physics and New Perspectives in Turbulence, Nagoya, Japan, 11-14 September 2006, edited by Y. Kaneda (Springer, 2008), pp. 291296.
16.D. G. Dritschel and J. Vanneste, “Instability of a shallow-water potential-vorticity front,” J. Fluid Mech. 561, 237254 (2006).
17.V. Zeitlin, “Decoupling of balanced and unbalanced motions and inertia–gravity wave emission: Small versus large Rossby numbers,” J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 35283542 (2008).
18.M. J. Lighthill, “On the sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory,” Proc. R. Soc. A 211, 564587 (1952).
19.B. Cushman-Roisin and B. Tang, “Geostrophic turbulence and emergence of eddies beyond the radius of deformation,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 20, 97113 (1990).<0097:GTAEOE>2.0.CO;2
20.N. Lahaye and V. Zeitlin, “Decaying vortex and wave turbulence in rotating shallow water model, as follows from high-resolution direct numerical simulations,” Phys. Fluids 24, 115106 (2012).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Inertia-gravity waveradiation from the merging of two co-rotating vortices is investigated numerically in a rotating shallow water system in order to focus on cyclone–anticyclone asymmetry at different values of the Rossby number (Ro). A numerical study is conducted on a model using a spectral method in an unbounded domain to estimate the gravity wave flux with high accuracy. Continuous gravity waveradiation is observed in three stages of vortical flows: co-rotating of the vortices, merging of the vortices, and unsteady motion of the merged vortex. A cyclone–anticyclone asymmetry appears at all stages at smaller Ro (≤20). Gravity waves from anticyclones are always larger than those from cyclones and have a local maximum at smaller Ro (∼2) compared with that for an idealized case of a co-rotating vortex pair with a constant rotation rate. The source originating in the Coriolis acceleration has a key role in cyclone–anticyclone asymmetry in gravity waves. An additional important factor is that at later stages, the merged axisymmetric anticyclone rotates faster than the elliptical cyclone due to the effect of the Rossby deformation radius, since a rotation rate higher than the inertial cutoff frequency is required to radiate gravity waves.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd