Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.W. F. Paxton, K. C. Kistler, C. C. Olmeda, A. Sen, S. K. S. Angelo, Y. Cao, T. E. Mallouk, P. E. Lammert, and V. H. Crespi, “Catalytic nanomotors: Autonomous movement of striped nanorods,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1342413431 (2004).
2.R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, “Propulsion of a molecular machine by asymmetric distribution of reaction products,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220801 (2005).
3.R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, “Designing phoretic micro-and nano-swimmers,” New J. Phys. 9, 126 (2007).
4.S. J. Ebbens and J. R. Howse, “Direct observation of the direction of motion for spherical catalytic swimmers,” Langmuir 27, 1229312296 (2011).
5.S. Ebbens, M.-H. Tu, J. R. Howse, and R. Golestanian, “Size dependence of the propulsion velocity for catalytic janus-sphere swimmers,” Phys. Rev. E 85, 020401 (2012).
6.J. L. Anderson, M. E. Lowell, and D. C. Prieve, “Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 1. Non-electrolytes,” J. Fluid Mech. 117, 107121 (1982).
7.U. M. Córdova-Figueroa and J. F. Brady, “Osmotic propulsion: The osmotic motor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 158303 (2008).
8.J. F. Brady, “Particle motion driven by solute gradients with application to autonomous motion: Continuum and colloidal perspectives,” J. Fluid Mech. 667, 216259 (2011).
9.U. M. Córdova-Figueroa, J. F. Brady, and S. Shklyaev, “Osmotic propulsion of colloidal particles via constant surface flux,” Soft Matter 9, 63826390 (2013).
10.W. F. Paxton, A. Sen, and T. E. Mallouk, “Motility of catalytic nanoparticles through self-generated forces,” Chem. - Eur. J. 11, 6462 (2005).
11.G. A. Ozin, I. Manners, S. Fournier-Bidoz, and A. Arsenault, “Dream nanomachines,” Adv. Mater. 17, 30113018 (2005).
12.S. Fournier-Bidoz, A. C. Arsenault, I. Manners, and G. A. Ozin, “Synthetic self-propelled nanorotors,” Chem. Commun. 2005, 441443.
13.M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, M. Tasinkevych, and J. Ralston, “Phoretic motion of spheroidal particles due to self-generated solute gradients,” Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys. 31, 351367 (2010).
14.E. Yariv, “Electrokinetic self-propulsion by inhomogeneous surface kinetics,” Proc. R. Soc. A 467, 1645 (2011).
15.E. Yariv and S. Michelin, “Phoretic self-propulsion at large Péclet numbers,” J. Fluid Mech. 768, R1 (2015).
16.R. G. Cox, “The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. Part 1. General theory,” J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791810 (1970).
17.G. K. Batchelor, “Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419441 (1970).
18.E. J. Hinch, Perturbation Methods (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
19.S. Michelin and E. Lauga, “Phoretic self-propulsion at finite Péclet numbers,” J. Fluid Mech. 747, 572604 (2014).
20.G. K. Batchelor, “The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles,” J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545570 (1970).
21.S. Shklyaev, J. F. Brady, and U. M. Córdova-Figueroa, “Non-spherical osmotic motor: Chemical sailing,” J. Fluid Mech. 748, 488520 (2014).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



We consider self-diffusiophoresis of axisymmetric particles using the continuum description of Golestanian [“Designing phoretic micro-and nano-swimmers,” New J. Phys. , 126 (2007)], where the chemical reaction at the particle boundary is modelled by a prescribed distribution of solute absorption and the interaction of solute molecules with that boundary is represented by diffusio-osmotic slip. With a view towards modelling of needle-like particle shapes, commonly employed in experiments, the self-propulsion problem is analyzed using slender-body theory. For a particle of length 2, whose boundary is specified by the axial distribution () of cross-sectional radius, we obtain the approximation for the particle velocity, wherein () is the solute-flux distribution, the diffusio-osmotic slip coefficient, and the solute diffusivity. This approximation can accommodate discontinuous flux distributions, which are commonly used for describing bimetallic particles; it agrees strikingly well with the numerical calculations of Popescu [“Phoretic motion of spheroidal particles due to self-generated solute gradients,” Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys. , 351–367 (2010)], performed for spheroidal particles.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd