1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Field-reversed configuration formation scheme utilizing a spheromak and solenoid induction
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2889428
/content/aip/journal/pop/15/3/10.1063/1.2889428
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/3/10.1063/1.2889428
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the MRX device, illustrating the spheromak-forming flux-cores, compensation coils, solenoids, and major diagnostics utilized in this research. The measured poloidal flux (contours) and toroidal field (colors) of typical FRC and spheromak discharges are superimposed on the top figure.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Evolution of neon spheromaks under inductive sustainment. The grey area corresponds to time before merging is complete.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Two-dimensional measurements of the poloidal flux (contours separated by ) and toroidal field (colors, in millitesla) for argon spheromaks with (upper row) and without (lower row) inductive sustainment. The upper plasma transition from a spheromak to a FRC. The grey area at the bottom of each figure is the location of the solenoid coil.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Evolution of the midplane profiles, for argon spheromaks that are allowed to decay (open symbols), and which transition to a FRC via inductive current drive (closed symbols). The toroidal field (top row), poloidal field (middle row), and electron pressure (bottom row) are illustrated.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Time evolution of argon spheromaks with different solenoid firing voltages. The scan and quantities plotted are identical to those in Fig. 2, but with argon instead of neon.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Time evolution of argon spheromaks with different starting times for the solenoid current ramp.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Comparison of the profiles in sustained and decaying discharges, for argon (top row) and neon (bottom row) discharges.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Analysis of magnetic helicity balance. (a) The toroidal , trapped poloidal , and solenoid fluxes; (b) the magnetic helicity; and (c) the resistivity inferred from helicity balance and the parallel Spitzer resistivity . The arrows in (a) indicate which vertical axis is associated with each curve.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Comparison of the growth rate from HYM and measurements in neon plasmas, and the toroidal flux decay rate , as a function of the Lundquist number.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Schematic illustration of FRC formation utilizing only a single flux-core and a solenoid.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/15/3/10.1063/1.2889428
2008-03-26
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Field-reversed configuration formation scheme utilizing a spheromak and solenoid induction
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/3/10.1063/1.2889428
10.1063/1.2889428
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM